I tried for a while nearly a year ago, but couldn't quite get it done via GUI or CLI.
ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 7:24 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question I don't have time to do a full trial of this, but I know I've seen it done in the past. I believe it's a combination of the rights "List Contents" and "Traverse", but I can't remember for sure. I'll be darned. Q303758 claims it can't be done. I still swear I've seen it, however. I just don't remember how it was done. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:07 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > What I cannot seem to get to work is this: > > no matter how I configure the permissions, you can either see all the > folders below the root (although perhaps not access them all) or > access (or > see) none of them as the removal of the folder permission > wont let you in. > > Say the root of C:\ has a folder called TEMP. > > (C:\TEMP\a > C:\TEMP\b > C:\TEMP\c) > > Temp is shared as VOL1. You want everyone to be able to map > VOL1 and then > see folders a,b or c depending on their assigned rights. I > can only get it > to work all or nothing. You can either see them all or none > (but I can vary > the levels of access.) > > Is this the limitation? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:52 AM > Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > First of all, the OS Wars are maintained at http://slashdot.org > > > > Second, if you're going to bash one OS as being inferior to > another, have > > your facts straight. In this case, you're wrong. > > > > Right Click | Properties | Security Tab | Advanced (button) > > > > The permission in question is called "List" and can be > applied to any > folder > > or file and user or group combination. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:38 AM > > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > > > > > > Nope you cant do this on Windoze. You can do this on > > > Netware, the OS of choice > > > for a truly well run enterprise. > > > > > > On 30 Dec 2002 at 9:45, Chris H wrote: > > > > > > > I have never actually had to do this before (but I do now > > > thanks to my boss! > > > > :) > > > > > > > > Can you set up NTFS permission so if there are a group of > > > folders in the > > > > root of a shared folder, a group has CHANGE SHARE > > > permissions and then > > > > CHANGE FOLDER permissions on ONE of the folders but not > > > even SEE (LIST?) the > > > > rest of the folders? I have tried selecting the rest and > > > setting DENY on > > > > every option but you can still list them and see them. > > > Ideas? Am I missing > > > > something stupid? Windows 2000 server sp3 > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
