Also, whilst we can discuss the potential for OS differences, I don't see such 
differences in my personal experience - certainly not as much as what these 
guys are reporting. I have this much gear at home: 
http://www.adopenstatic.com/temp/homenetwork.jpg and I think that's a 
reasonably representative sample of various machines.

Cheers
Ken

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, 19 December 2008 4:48 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OT - Anyone VM a Mac Leopard OS on a PC?
> 
> Whilst the OS is different, there isn't that much difference in memory
> management algorithms and CPU schedulers. It's the same basic research and
> theory that goes into that fundamental level stuff.
> 
> On top of that there are bigger differences - approaches to building OS
> functionality. But that /shouldn't/ affect how quickly Photoshop applies a
> filter. The filter code is from Adobe in both cases, and the actual work is
> done by the CPU, with stuff stored in RAM, and rendered by a GPU.
> 
> Cheers
> Ken
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, 19 December 2008 3:46 PM
> > To: NT System Admin Issues
> > Subject: Re: OT - Anyone VM a Mac Leopard OS on a PC?
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > > The only difference would be in the OS.
> >
> >   Right, and that's completely, totally different.  MacOS is a Mach
> > microkernel supporting a BSD layer supporting tons of Apple custom
> > stuff.  NT is pretty much its own beast.  They've got nothing in
> > common except the command-line FTP client (Copyright by The Regents of
> > the University of California, doncha know?).  Different kernel,
> > different scheduler, different network stack, different graphics
> > subsystem, different video drivers.  More than likely, the application
> > -- and the runtime libraries it depends on, and the compiler it was
> > built with -- have some major differences between platforms, too.
> >
> >   I'm not disagreeing with your suggested scientific approach to
> > things -- indeed, I think you're right on in questioning whether it's
> > really a platform different, and not just a broken installation -- but
> > dismissing the OS difference so casually is highly bogus.  :-)
> >
> > -- Ben
> >
> > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> 
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to