No clones....this was coming up in 6.1 6 months ago though, so I've seen it still happening a bit.
On 21 August 2011 12:04, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you using clones? The reason the nodes were "gone" is that Nuke would > gave stopped loading the script after the error, meaning the info should > still be in the no file. > > We used to see this a lot a few years ago but could never resolve it afaik. > So if it's reproducible it'd be great to send the script to support! > > > > On Aug 21, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > A bit more info: in this case, there are four shots in the one script with > four very similar node trees for each shot, and the last tree is completely > gone except for the backdrop nodes. Of the first three, they all have > deleted nodes at different points in the tree even though the tree is very > similar. > > We have managed to salvage stuff to the point where we are mostly OK but > obviously we would like to know what happened. > > On 21 August 2011 11:27, Michael Garrett < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Excuse my poorly worded email, I'm still waking up here. There was only >> one kind of "blank error" message that is occasionally appearing on script >> open. but some of the nodes are gone regardless. >> >> >> On 21 August 2011 11:19, Michael Garrett < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm getting the random blank error message when re-opening a node graph >>> from last night and some nodes have disappeared. I'm also occasionally >>> getting the "blank error" message on script open. >>> >>> There are no gizmo changes overnight or cloned nodes that can typically >>> cause this kind of issue. Historically, merging the script or deleting the >>> Viewers in a text editor could help but there are other solutions I can't >>> remember. >>> >>> Is the best way to fix this issue just to comb through the script in a >>> text editor and copy/paste sections in? Any magic bullets? We're in 6.2v4 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> > http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
