Thanks Fergal!
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Chetan, > > Thanks for setting this up, guys. I use SO all the time for very technical > questions, but this is a really great idea. I think the mailing list and > the Wiki are key for the community, but definitely SO is another way to go. > > I've answered your question (there may be further answers) at > http://stackoverflow.com/q/19851096/2969741 > > Basically the main use for the ClassifierOnly tagging is when the field > you're trying to predict is not (always) present in the data. For example, > in a possible variation on the HotGym example, the thermostat setting might > be a desired field to predict (ie to set), but you'll only have historical > data. > > ML competitions often give you a training set with "outcome" fields, which > you are supposed to predict, compute, or estimate with test data, and that > test data does not include those fields. > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wow, that was fast - I didn't even had to post/edit anything! >> >> Azat >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:32 PM >> >> I got a buddy to tag a few questions. >> Azat, you can go ahead and create a new question with the >> new tag! >> >> :) Matt >> >> Sent from my MegaPhone >> >> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Azat <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Actually I wanted to ask this question : >> > >> > I just got a 4Gb image (.ova) created by Marek for VM - >> anyone successfully installed it on Mac OS X (10.9) ? Any >> additional recommendations ? Thanks! >> > >> > Azat >> > >> > -------------------------------------------- >> > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:21 PM >> > >> > Let's get started - Matt you could >> > post a question and then we need only 30+ people to >> vote you >> > up ! >> > >> > Azat >> > >> > -------------------------------------------- >> > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:07 PM >> > >> > I have 650 or so. :/ >> > >> > Sent from my MegaPhone >> > >> >>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> If there's no one with such a high score, we can >> > either >> > ask them politely, or play by the rules which (as >> far as I >> > understand) requires 50 people to : >> >> >> >> question is voted up: +5 >> >> answer is voted up: +10 >> >> answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to >> acceptor) >> > >> >> >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation >> >> >> >> Minimally: (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-) >> >> >> >> Or finally we can use some other venue for >> > categorised >> > topics. >> >> >> >> Azat >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >>> On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM >> >> >> >> Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation" >> >> for a new tag like 'nupic' ... >> >> [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least >> 1500 >> >> reputation. ] >> >> >> >> Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on >> SO >> > already >> >> ? >> >> >> >> Azat >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC >> Learning Hub >> >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." >> <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, >> 5:24 PM >> >> >> >> I've like the idea of >> >> StackOverflow, in fact I've looked >> into it in the >> > past. >> >> The thing about getting a >> dedicated StackExchange >> > section >> >> is >> >> that there needs to be ample >> evidence of interest >> > first. >> >> The >> >> Area51 crew are not going to >> approve a NuPIC site >> > without >> >> a >> >> large community of active >> supporters. I was >> > planning on >> >> moving in this direction once >> we've grown a bit >> > more. >> >> It's not easy to get an Area51 >> proposal into a SO >> > site, >> >> for example, Arduino is still in >> the proposal >> > stage (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino). >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> The best place to start is on the >> main >> >> stackoverflow site itself. >> >> >> >> How about this... >> >> There are no questions tagged >> with >> >> "nupic" at this point, which is >> great because we >> >> have an empty namespace to occupy: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic >> >> >> >> >> >> I welcome anyone with a technical >> question about >> >> NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com >> >> with the tag "nupic". It would >> also be a good >> > idea >> >> (at least initially) to post a >> link to your >> > question on >> >> the >> >> mailing list until we built up >> enough steam on SO >> > that it >> >> is >> >> consistently monitored by the >> community. >> >> >> >> >> >> Any volunteers? >> >> ---------Matt TaylorOS Community >> >> Flag-BearerNumenta >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at >> >> 3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> A wiki is an >> >> awesome idea! Numenta, how about >> it? I think this >> > is >> >> something that would benefit you >> too. I too have >> > been >> >> struggling to get started. There >> is much you have >> > to >> >> discover the hard way. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> For a >> >> Stackoverflow style of site, >> how >> > about..... >> >> Stackoverflow! >> >> At least initially anyway. If that >> is popular >> > then we >> >> could >> >> propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and >> >> get our own StackNupic. I >> definitely agree that >> > this style >> >> of site is much more useful than >> trying to search >> > mail >> >> lists. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Let's start >> >> asking and answering questions >> there and see how >> > it >> >> goes. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> CheersMark >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7 November 2013 >> >> 19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello everybody! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It seems that as the community >> grows the problem >> > of being >> >> a >> >> good >> >> >> >> documentation and stuff which can >> help to learn >> > NuPIC >> >> becomes more >> >> >> >> important. For example I >> personally resolved my >> > problem of >> >> installing >> >> >> >> NuPIC just accidentally by getting >> an advice from >> > one of >> >> friends. The >> >> >> >> solution was buried in depth of >> many posts and I >> > didn’t >> >> aware about >> >> >> >> it. Now I have a very useful >> experience which >> > could help >> >> other >> >> >> >> members. But where should I >> publish it to make it >> > easy to >> >> get by them? >> >> >> >> If I write to the mailing list it >> may be the same >> > case. Of >> >> course >> >> >> >> there are other great places — >> wiki, Youtube >> > channel, >> >> but >> >> they have >> >> >> >> own limitations. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So here is an idea to build some >> kind of a >> > learning center >> >> (let’s call >> >> >> >> it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning >> Hub). Every >> > member of >> >> community may >> >> >> >> contribute to NLH by adding own >> answers to >> > questions which >> >> were asked >> >> >> >> by other members if he/she has a >> time and/or such >> > a >> >> willing. >> >> Gradually >> >> >> >> those answers may form stuff for a >> comprehensive >> >> documentation for the >> >> >> >> NuPIC platform. It may be some >> single site or may >> > be a >> >> section on >> >> >> >> Numenta.org (or some another >> place). Making a >> > prototype of >> >> NLH is >> >> >> >> considered not a very >> sophisticated task so I can >> > do it >> >> because >> >> >> >> web-development is my common job >> (of course if >> > somebody >> >> wants to help >> >> >> >> me it will be great also). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This is the idea in short. >> Speaking more >> > detailed: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I suggest there may be 2 main >> section. First is >> > a >> >> “Documentation”, >> >> >> >> which is in essence the standard >> pages describing >> > the >> >> platform, its >> >> >> >> methods, OPF and so on. Users can >> add comments >> > to >> >> published >> >> stuff. >> >> >> >> There are lots of examples in the >> Net (consider >> > php.net or >> >> something >> >> >> >> of this kind). Of course, the >> problem is that >> > this demands >> >> enormous >> >> >> >> efforts (time in the first turn). >> So in order to >> > make it >> >> much more >> >> >> >> easier there is a second sections >> which should >> > look more >> >> like a >> >> >> >> Stackoverflow (of course it’s >> hardly to hope >> > that it >> >> will >> >> have the >> >> >> >> same functionality from the very >> beginning, but I >> > guess it >> >> isn’t >> >> >> >> necessary yet). I.e. any community >> member may >> > leave own >> >> question while >> >> >> >> other members who possesses an >> answer may create >> > it there. >> >> All the >> >> >> >> questions may be ranked by users >> who votes by a >> > standard >> >> way >> >> (+/-). So >> >> >> >> after any question got an enough >> answers or rank >> > it may be >> >> used as a >> >> >> >> basics for the “official” >> stuff in the >> >> “Documentation” sections. It >> >> >> >> means that Admin (Moderator and so >> on, there may >> > be few of >> >> them) >> >> >> >> converts it to the article and >> places it in the >> > section >> >> mentioned >> >> >> >> above. In that section may be >> “empty” >> > articles, i.e. >> >> they have only a >> >> >> >> title, but have no content. >> However this title is >> > a link >> >> to >> >> the page >> >> >> >> containing a question dedicated to >> the subject >> > and answers >> >> added by >> >> >> >> community members (i.e. the second >> section). >> > After an >> >> article being >> >> >> >> filled by stuff made of members’ >> answers there >> > a link to >> >> the page >> >> >> >> which contained those answers to >> see the history >> > of >> >> question >> >> will be >> >> >> >> added. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So as a rule we have one of two >> things: an >> > official >> >> article >> >> in the Doc >> >> >> >> section or “unofficial” page >> with the ranked >> > question >> >> and answers >> >> >> >> (probably ranked also) to it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Of course, there may be lots of >> other interesting >> > things >> >> and >> >> we can >> >> >> >> consider all of them after if the >> community will >> > be >> >> interested by the >> >> >> >> idea. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> SY Sergey V. Cleftsow >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Inline Attachment >> Follows----- >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > > > > -- > > Fergal Byrne > > <http://www.examsupport.ie>Brenter IT > [email protected] +353 83 4214179 > Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
