Just asked a question with the shiny new `nupic` tag! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19851096/what-is-the-purpose-of-the-classifierinput-encoder-field-in-the-model-parameter
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]> wrote: > I can do it! Just have to think of a question to ask first :) > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have 650 or so. :/ >> >> Sent from my MegaPhone >> >> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > If there's no one with such a high score, we can either ask them >> politely, or play by the rules which (as far as I understand) requires 50 >> people to : >> > >> > question is voted up: +5 >> > answer is voted up: +10 >> > answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to acceptor) >> > >> > http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation >> > >> > Minimally: (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-) >> > >> > Or finally we can use some other venue for categorised topics. >> > >> > Azat >> > >> > -------------------------------------------- >> > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM >> > >> > Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation" >> > for a new tag like 'nupic' ... >> > [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least 1500 >> > reputation. ] >> > >> > Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on SO already >> > ? >> > >> > Azat >> > >> > -------------------------------------------- >> > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 5:24 PM >> > >> > I've like the idea of >> > StackOverflow, in fact I've looked into it in the past. >> > The thing about getting a dedicated StackExchange section >> > is >> > that there needs to be ample evidence of interest first. >> > The >> > Area51 crew are not going to approve a NuPIC site without >> > a >> > large community of active supporters. I was planning on >> > moving in this direction once we've grown a bit more. >> > It's not easy to get an Area51 proposal into a SO site, >> > for example, Arduino is still in the proposal stage ( >> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino). >> > >> > >> > The best place to start is on the main >> > stackoverflow site itself. >> > >> > How about this... >> > There are no questions tagged with >> > "nupic" at this point, which is great because we >> > have an empty namespace to occupy: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic >> > >> > >> > I welcome anyone with a technical question about >> > NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com >> > with the tag "nupic". It would also be a good idea >> > (at least initially) to post a link to your question on >> > the >> > mailing list until we built up enough steam on SO that it >> > is >> > consistently monitored by the community. >> > >> > >> > Any volunteers? >> > ---------Matt TaylorOS Community >> > Flag-BearerNumenta >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at >> > 3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > A wiki is an >> > awesome idea! Numenta, how about it? I think this is >> > something that would benefit you too. I too have been >> > struggling to get started. There is much you have to >> > discover the hard way. >> > >> > >> > >> > For a >> > Stackoverflow style of site, how about..... >> > Stackoverflow! >> > At least initially anyway. If that is popular then we >> > could >> > propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and >> > get our own StackNupic. I definitely agree that this style >> > of site is much more useful than trying to search mail >> > lists. >> > >> > >> > >> > Let's start >> > asking and answering questions there and see how it >> > goes. >> > >> > >> > >> > CheersMark >> > >> > >> > >> > On 7 November 2013 >> > 19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hello everybody! >> > >> > >> > >> > It seems that as the community grows the problem of being >> > a >> > good >> > >> > documentation and stuff which can help to learn NuPIC >> > becomes more >> > >> > important. For example I personally resolved my problem of >> > installing >> > >> > NuPIC just accidentally by getting an advice from one of >> > friends. The >> > >> > solution was buried in depth of many posts and I didn’t >> > aware about >> > >> > it. Now I have a very useful experience which could help >> > other >> > >> > members. But where should I publish it to make it easy to >> > get by them? >> > >> > If I write to the mailing list it may be the same case. Of >> > course >> > >> > there are other great places — wiki, Youtube channel, >> > but >> > they have >> > >> > own limitations. >> > >> > >> > >> > So here is an idea to build some kind of a learning center >> > (let’s call >> > >> > it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning Hub). Every member of >> > community may >> > >> > contribute to NLH by adding own answers to questions which >> > were asked >> > >> > by other members if he/she has a time and/or such a >> > willing. >> > Gradually >> > >> > those answers may form stuff for a comprehensive >> > documentation for the >> > >> > NuPIC platform. It may be some single site or may be a >> > section on >> > >> > Numenta.org (or some another place). Making a prototype of >> > NLH is >> > >> > considered not a very sophisticated task so I can do it >> > because >> > >> > web-development is my common job (of course if somebody >> > wants to help >> > >> > me it will be great also). >> > >> > >> > >> > This is the idea in short. Speaking more detailed: >> > >> > >> > >> > I suggest there may be 2 main section. First is a >> > “Documentation”, >> > >> > which is in essence the standard pages describing the >> > platform, its >> > >> > methods, OPF and so on. Users can add comments to >> > published >> > stuff. >> > >> > There are lots of examples in the Net (consider php.net or >> > something >> > >> > of this kind). Of course, the problem is that this demands >> > enormous >> > >> > efforts (time in the first turn). So in order to make it >> > much more >> > >> > easier there is a second sections which should look more >> > like a >> > >> > Stackoverflow (of course it’s hardly to hope that it >> > will >> > have the >> > >> > same functionality from the very beginning, but I guess it >> > isn’t >> > >> > necessary yet). I.e. any community member may leave own >> > question while >> > >> > other members who possesses an answer may create it there. >> > All the >> > >> > questions may be ranked by users who votes by a standard >> > way >> > (+/-). So >> > >> > after any question got an enough answers or rank it may be >> > used as a >> > >> > basics for the “official” stuff in the >> > “Documentation” sections. It >> > >> > means that Admin (Moderator and so on, there may be few of >> > them) >> > >> > converts it to the article and places it in the section >> > mentioned >> > >> > above. In that section may be “empty” articles, i.e. >> > they have only a >> > >> > title, but have no content. However this title is a link >> > to >> > the page >> > >> > containing a question dedicated to the subject and answers >> > added by >> > >> > community members (i.e. the second section). After an >> > article being >> > >> > filled by stuff made of members’ answers there a link to >> > the page >> > >> > which contained those answers to see the history of >> > question >> > will be >> > >> > added. >> > >> > >> > >> > So as a rule we have one of two things: an official >> > article >> > in the Doc >> > >> > section or “unofficial” page with the ranked question >> > and answers >> > >> > (probably ranked also) to it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Of course, there may be lots of other interesting things >> > and >> > we can >> > >> > consider all of them after if the community will be >> > interested by the >> > >> > idea. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > SY Sergey V. Cleftsow >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > nupic mailing list >> > >> > [email protected] >> > >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > nupic mailing list >> > >> > [email protected] >> > >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nupic mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
