Wow, that was fast - I didn't even had to post/edit anything!

Azat

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:32 PM
 
 I got a buddy to tag a few questions.
 Azat, you can go ahead and create a new question with the
 new tag!
 
 :) Matt
 
 Sent from my MegaPhone
 
 > On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Azat <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 > 
 > Actually I wanted to ask this question :
 > 
 > I just got a 4Gb image (.ova) created by Marek for VM -
 anyone successfully installed it on Mac OS X (10.9) ? Any
 additional recommendations ? Thanks!
 > 
 > Azat
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------
 > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 > 
 > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:21 PM
 > 
 > Let's get started - Matt you could
 > post a question and then we need only 30+ people to
 vote you
 > up !
 > 
 > Azat
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------
 > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
 > wrote:
 > 
 >  Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 >  To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 >  Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:07 PM
 > 
 >  I have 650 or so. :/
 > 
 >  Sent from my MegaPhone
 > 
 >>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]>
 >>  wrote:
 >> 
 >> If there's no one with such a high score, we can
 > either
 >  ask them politely, or play by the rules which (as
 far as I
 >  understand) requires 50  people to :
 >> 
 >> question is voted up: +5
 >> answer is voted up: +10
 >> answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to
 acceptor)
 > 
 >> 
 >> http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation
 >> 
 >> Minimally:  (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-)
 >> 
 >> Or finally we can use some other venue for
 > categorised
 >  topics.
 >> 
 >> Azat
 >> 
 >> --------------------------------------------
 >>> On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]>
 >>  wrote:
 >> 
 >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM
 >> 
 >> Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation"
 >> for a new tag like 'nupic' ...
 >> [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least
 1500
 >> reputation. ]
 >> 
 >> Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on
 SO
 >  already
 >> ?
 >> 
 >> Azat
 >> 
 >> --------------------------------------------
 >> On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
 >> wrote:
 >> 
 >>   Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC
 Learning Hub
 >>   To: "NuPIC general mailing list."
 <[email protected]>
 >>   Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013,
 5:24 PM
 >> 
 >>   I've like the idea of
 >>   StackOverflow, in fact I've looked
 into it in the
 >  past.
 >>   The thing about getting a
 dedicated StackExchange
 >  section
 >> is
 >>   that there needs to be ample
 evidence of interest
 >  first.
 >> The
 >>   Area51 crew are not going to
 approve a NuPIC site
 >  without
 >> a
 >>   large community of active
 supporters. I was
 >  planning on
 >>   moving in this direction once
 we've grown a bit
 >  more.
 >>   It's not easy to get an Area51
 proposal into a SO
 >  site,
 >>   for example, Arduino is still in
 the proposal
 >  stage (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino).
 > 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   The best place to start is on the
 main
 >>   stackoverflow site itself. 
 >> 
 >>   How about this... 
 >>   There are no questions tagged
 with
 >>   "nupic" at this point, which is
 great because we
 >>   have an empty namespace to occupy:
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   I welcome anyone with a technical
 question about
 >>   NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com
 >>   with the tag "nupic". It would
 also be a good
 >  idea
 >>   (at least initially) to post a
 link to your
 >  question on
 >> the
 >>   mailing list until we built up
 enough steam on SO
 >  that it
 >> is
 >>   consistently monitored by the
 community. 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   Any volunteers?
 >>   ---------Matt TaylorOS Community
 >>   Flag-BearerNumenta
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at
 >>   3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]>
 >>   wrote:
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   A wiki is an
 >>   awesome idea! Numenta, how about
 it? I think this
 >  is
 >>   something that would benefit you
 too. I too have
 >  been
 >>   struggling to get started. There
 is much you have
 >  to
 >>   discover the hard way.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   For a
 >>   Stackoverflow style of site, 
 how
 >  about.....
 >> Stackoverflow!
 >>   At least initially anyway. If that
 is popular
 >  then we
 >> could
 >>   propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and
 >>   get our own StackNupic. I
 definitely agree that
 >  this style
 >>   of site is much more useful than
 trying to search
 >  mail
 >>   lists.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   Let's start
 >>   asking and answering questions
 there and see how
 >  it
 >>   goes.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   CheersMark
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   On 7 November 2013
 >>   19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]>
 >>   wrote:
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   Hello everybody!
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   It seems that as the community
 grows the problem
 >  of being
 >> a
 >>   good
 >> 
 >>   documentation and stuff which can
 help to learn
 >  NuPIC
 >>   becomes more
 >> 
 >>   important. For example I
 personally resolved my
 >  problem of
 >>   installing
 >> 
 >>   NuPIC just accidentally by getting
 an advice from
 >  one of
 >>   friends. The
 >> 
 >>   solution was buried in depth of
 many posts and I
 >  didn’t
 >>   aware about
 >> 
 >>   it. Now I have a very useful
 experience which
 >  could help
 >>   other
 >> 
 >>   members. But where should I
 publish it to make it
 >  easy to
 >>   get by them?
 >> 
 >>   If I write to the mailing list it
 may be the same
 >  case. Of
 >>   course
 >> 
 >>   there are other great places —
 wiki, Youtube
 >  channel,
 >> but
 >>   they have
 >> 
 >>   own limitations.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   So here is an idea to build some
 kind of a
 >  learning center
 >>   (let’s call
 >> 
 >>   it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning
 Hub). Every
 >  member of
 >>   community may
 >> 
 >>   contribute to NLH by adding own
 answers to
 >  questions which
 >>   were asked
 >> 
 >>   by other members if he/she has a
 time and/or such
 >  a
 >> willing.
 >>   Gradually
 >> 
 >>   those answers may form stuff for a
 comprehensive
 >>   documentation for the
 >> 
 >>   NuPIC platform. It may be some
 single site or may
 >  be a
 >>   section on
 >> 
 >>   Numenta.org (or some another
 place). Making a
 >  prototype of
 >>   NLH is
 >> 
 >>   considered not a very
 sophisticated task so I can
 >  do it
 >>   because
 >> 
 >>   web-development is my common job
 (of course if
 >  somebody
 >>   wants to help
 >> 
 >>   me it will be great also).
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   This is the idea in short.
 Speaking more
 >  detailed:
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   I suggest there may be 2 main
 section. First is
 >  a
 >>   “Documentation”,
 >> 
 >>   which is in essence the standard
 pages describing
 >  the
 >>   platform, its
 >> 
 >>   methods, OPF and so on. Users can
 add comments
 >  to
 >> published
 >>   stuff.
 >> 
 >>   There are lots of examples in the
 Net (consider
 >  php.net or
 >> something
 >> 
 >>   of this kind). Of course, the
 problem is that
 >  this demands
 >>   enormous
 >> 
 >>   efforts (time in the first turn).
 So in order to
 >  make it
 >>   much more
 >> 
 >>   easier there is a second sections
 which should
 >  look more
 >>   like a
 >> 
 >>   Stackoverflow (of course it’s
 hardly to hope
 >  that it
 >> will
 >>   have the
 >> 
 >>   same functionality from the very
 beginning, but I
 >  guess it
 >>   isn’t
 >> 
 >>   necessary yet). I.e. any community
 member may
 >  leave own
 >>   question while
 >> 
 >>   other members who possesses an
 answer may create
 >  it there.
 >>   All the
 >> 
 >>   questions may be ranked by users
 who votes by a
 >  standard
 >> way
 >>   (+/-). So
 >> 
 >>   after any question got an enough
 answers or rank
 >  it may be
 >>   used as a
 >> 
 >>   basics for the “official”
 stuff in the
 >>   “Documentation” sections. It
 >> 
 >>   means that Admin (Moderator and so
 on, there may
 >  be few of
 >>   them)
 >> 
 >>   converts it to the article and
 places it in the
 >  section
 >>   mentioned
 >> 
 >>   above. In that section may be
 “empty”
 >  articles, i.e.
 >>   they have only a
 >> 
 >>   title, but have no content.
 However this title is
 >  a link
 >> to
 >>   the page
 >> 
 >>   containing a question dedicated to
 the subject
 >  and answers
 >>   added by
 >> 
 >>   community members (i.e. the second
 section).
 >  After an
 >>   article being
 >> 
 >>   filled by stuff made of members’
 answers there
 >  a link to
 >>   the page
 >> 
 >>   which contained those answers to
 see the history
 >  of
 >> question
 >>   will be
 >> 
 >>   added.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   So as a rule we have one of two
 things: an
 >  official
 >> article
 >>   in the Doc
 >> 
 >>   section or “unofficial” page
 with the ranked
 >  question
 >>   and answers
 >> 
 >>   (probably ranked also) to it.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   Of course, there may be lots of
 other interesting
 >  things
 >> and
 >>   we can
 >> 
 >>   consider all of them after if the
 community will
 >  be
 >>   interested by the
 >> 
 >>   idea.
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   --
 >> 
 >>   SY Sergey V. Cleftsow
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   _______________________________________________
 >> 
 >>   nupic mailing list
 >> 
 >>   [email protected]
 >> 
 >>   http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   _______________________________________________
 >> 
 >>   nupic mailing list
 >> 
 >>   [email protected]
 >> 
 >>   http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >> 
 >>   -----Inline Attachment
 Follows-----
 >> 
 >>   _______________________________________________
 >>   nupic mailing list
 >>   [email protected]
 >>   http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 >> 
 >> 
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> nupic mailing list
 >> [email protected]
 >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 >> 
 >> 
 >> _______________________________________________
 >> nupic mailing list
 >> [email protected]
 >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 >  _______________________________________________
 >  nupic mailing list
 >  [email protected]http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > nupic mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > nupic mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 
 _______________________________________________
 nupic mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to