I got a buddy to tag a few questions. Azat, you can go ahead and create a new question with the new tag!
:) Matt Sent from my MegaPhone > On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:22 PM, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually I wanted to ask this question : > > I just got a 4Gb image (.ova) created by Marek for VM - anyone successfully > installed it on Mac OS X (10.9) ? Any additional recommendations ? Thanks! > > Azat > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:21 PM > > Let's get started - Matt you could > post a question and then we need only 30+ people to vote you > up ! > > Azat > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:07 PM > > I have 650 or so. :/ > > Sent from my MegaPhone > >>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> If there's no one with such a high score, we can > either > ask them politely, or play by the rules which (as far as I > understand) requires 50 people to : >> >> question is voted up: +5 >> answer is voted up: +10 >> answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to acceptor) > >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation >> >> Minimally: (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-) >> >> Or finally we can use some other venue for > categorised > topics. >> >> Azat >> >> -------------------------------------------- >>> On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM >> >> Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation" >> for a new tag like 'nupic' ... >> [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least 1500 >> reputation. ] >> >> Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on SO > already >> ? >> >> Azat >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub >> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 5:24 PM >> >> I've like the idea of >> StackOverflow, in fact I've looked into it in the > past. >> The thing about getting a dedicated StackExchange > section >> is >> that there needs to be ample evidence of interest > first. >> The >> Area51 crew are not going to approve a NuPIC site > without >> a >> large community of active supporters. I was > planning on >> moving in this direction once we've grown a bit > more. >> It's not easy to get an Area51 proposal into a SO > site, >> for example, Arduino is still in the proposal > stage (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino). > >> >> >> The best place to start is on the main >> stackoverflow site itself. >> >> How about this... >> There are no questions tagged with >> "nupic" at this point, which is great because we >> have an empty namespace to occupy: >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic >> >> >> I welcome anyone with a technical question about >> NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com >> with the tag "nupic". It would also be a good > idea >> (at least initially) to post a link to your > question on >> the >> mailing list until we built up enough steam on SO > that it >> is >> consistently monitored by the community. >> >> >> Any volunteers? >> ---------Matt TaylorOS Community >> Flag-BearerNumenta >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at >> 3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> A wiki is an >> awesome idea! Numenta, how about it? I think this > is >> something that would benefit you too. I too have > been >> struggling to get started. There is much you have > to >> discover the hard way. >> >> >> >> For a >> Stackoverflow style of site, how > about..... >> Stackoverflow! >> At least initially anyway. If that is popular > then we >> could >> propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and >> get our own StackNupic. I definitely agree that > this style >> of site is much more useful than trying to search > mail >> lists. >> >> >> >> Let's start >> asking and answering questions there and see how > it >> goes. >> >> >> >> CheersMark >> >> >> >> On 7 November 2013 >> 19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hello everybody! >> >> >> >> It seems that as the community grows the problem > of being >> a >> good >> >> documentation and stuff which can help to learn > NuPIC >> becomes more >> >> important. For example I personally resolved my > problem of >> installing >> >> NuPIC just accidentally by getting an advice from > one of >> friends. The >> >> solution was buried in depth of many posts and I > didn’t >> aware about >> >> it. Now I have a very useful experience which > could help >> other >> >> members. But where should I publish it to make it > easy to >> get by them? >> >> If I write to the mailing list it may be the same > case. Of >> course >> >> there are other great places — wiki, Youtube > channel, >> but >> they have >> >> own limitations. >> >> >> >> So here is an idea to build some kind of a > learning center >> (let’s call >> >> it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning Hub). Every > member of >> community may >> >> contribute to NLH by adding own answers to > questions which >> were asked >> >> by other members if he/she has a time and/or such > a >> willing. >> Gradually >> >> those answers may form stuff for a comprehensive >> documentation for the >> >> NuPIC platform. It may be some single site or may > be a >> section on >> >> Numenta.org (or some another place). Making a > prototype of >> NLH is >> >> considered not a very sophisticated task so I can > do it >> because >> >> web-development is my common job (of course if > somebody >> wants to help >> >> me it will be great also). >> >> >> >> This is the idea in short. Speaking more > detailed: >> >> >> >> I suggest there may be 2 main section. First is > a >> “Documentation”, >> >> which is in essence the standard pages describing > the >> platform, its >> >> methods, OPF and so on. Users can add comments > to >> published >> stuff. >> >> There are lots of examples in the Net (consider > php.net or >> something >> >> of this kind). Of course, the problem is that > this demands >> enormous >> >> efforts (time in the first turn). So in order to > make it >> much more >> >> easier there is a second sections which should > look more >> like a >> >> Stackoverflow (of course it’s hardly to hope > that it >> will >> have the >> >> same functionality from the very beginning, but I > guess it >> isn’t >> >> necessary yet). I.e. any community member may > leave own >> question while >> >> other members who possesses an answer may create > it there. >> All the >> >> questions may be ranked by users who votes by a > standard >> way >> (+/-). So >> >> after any question got an enough answers or rank > it may be >> used as a >> >> basics for the “official” stuff in the >> “Documentation” sections. It >> >> means that Admin (Moderator and so on, there may > be few of >> them) >> >> converts it to the article and places it in the > section >> mentioned >> >> above. In that section may be “empty” > articles, i.e. >> they have only a >> >> title, but have no content. However this title is > a link >> to >> the page >> >> containing a question dedicated to the subject > and answers >> added by >> >> community members (i.e. the second section). > After an >> article being >> >> filled by stuff made of members’ answers there > a link to >> the page >> >> which contained those answers to see the history > of >> question >> will be >> >> added. >> >> >> >> So as a rule we have one of two things: an > official >> article >> in the Doc >> >> section or “unofficial” page with the ranked > question >> and answers >> >> (probably ranked also) to it. >> >> >> >> Of course, there may be lots of other interesting > things >> and >> we can >> >> consider all of them after if the community will > be >> interested by the >> >> idea. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> SY Sergey V. Cleftsow >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nupic mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org _______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
