Let's get started - Matt you could post a question and then we need only 30+ 
people to vote you up !

Azat

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 9:07 PM
 
 I have 650 or so. :/
 
 Sent from my MegaPhone
 
 > On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 > 
 > If there's no one with such a high score, we can either
 ask them politely, or play by the rules which (as far as I
 understand) requires 50  people to :
 > 
 > question is voted up: +5
 > answer is voted up: +10
 > answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to acceptor) 
 > 
 > http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation
 > 
 > Minimally:  (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-)
 > 
 > Or finally we can use some other venue for categorised
 topics.
 > 
 > Azat
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------
 > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 > 
 > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM
 > 
 > Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation"
 > for a new tag like 'nupic' ...
 > [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least 1500
 > reputation. ]
 > 
 > Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on SO
 already
 > ?
 > 
 > Azat
 > 
 > --------------------------------------------
 > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
 > wrote:
 > 
 >  Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub
 >  To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
 >  Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 5:24 PM
 > 
 >  I've like the idea of
 >  StackOverflow, in fact I've looked into it in the
 past.
 >  The thing about getting a dedicated StackExchange
 section
 > is
 >  that there needs to be ample evidence of interest
 first.
 > The
 >  Area51 crew are not going to approve a NuPIC site
 without
 > a
 >  large community of active supporters. I was
 planning on
 >  moving in this direction once we've grown a bit
 more.
 >  It's not easy to get an Area51 proposal into a SO
 site,
 >  for example, Arduino is still in the proposal
 stage (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino).
 
 > 
 > 
 >  The best place to start is on the main
 >  stackoverflow site itself. 
 > 
 >  How about this... 
 >  There are no questions tagged with
 >  "nupic" at this point, which is great because we
 >  have an empty namespace to occupy: 
 >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic
 > 
 > 
 >  I welcome anyone with a technical question about
 >  NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com
 >  with the tag "nupic". It would also be a good
 idea
 >  (at least initially) to post a link to your
 question on
 > the
 >  mailing list until we built up enough steam on SO
 that it
 > is
 >  consistently monitored by the community. 
 > 
 > 
 >  Any volunteers?
 >  ---------Matt TaylorOS Community
 >  Flag-BearerNumenta
 > 
 > 
 >  On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at
 >  3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]>
 >  wrote:
 > 
 > 
 >  A wiki is an
 >  awesome idea! Numenta, how about it? I think this
 is
 >  something that would benefit you too. I too have
 been
 >  struggling to get started. There is much you have
 to
 >  discover the hard way.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  For a
 >  Stackoverflow style of site,  how
 about.....
 > Stackoverflow!
 >  At least initially anyway. If that is popular
 then we
 > could
 >  propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and
 >  get our own StackNupic. I definitely agree that
 this style
 >  of site is much more useful than trying to search
 mail
 >  lists.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  Let's start
 >  asking and answering questions there and see how
 it
 >  goes.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  CheersMark
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  On 7 November 2013
 >  19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]>
 >  wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  Hello everybody!
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  It seems that as the community grows the problem
 of being
 > a
 >  good
 > 
 >  documentation and stuff which can help to learn
 NuPIC
 >  becomes more
 > 
 >  important. For example I personally resolved my
 problem of
 >  installing
 > 
 >  NuPIC just accidentally by getting an advice from
 one of
 >  friends. The
 > 
 >  solution was buried in depth of many posts and I
 didn’t
 >  aware about
 > 
 >  it. Now I have a very useful experience which
 could help
 >  other
 > 
 >  members. But where should I publish it to make it
 easy to
 >  get by them?
 > 
 >  If I write to the mailing list it may be the same
 case. Of
 >  course
 > 
 >  there are other great places — wiki, Youtube
 channel,
 > but
 >  they have
 > 
 >  own limitations.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  So here is an idea to build some kind of a
 learning center
 >  (let’s call
 > 
 >  it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning Hub). Every
 member of
 >  community may
 > 
 >  contribute to NLH by adding own answers to
 questions which
 >  were asked
 > 
 >  by other members if he/she has a time and/or such
 a
 > willing.
 >  Gradually
 > 
 >  those answers may form stuff for a comprehensive
 >  documentation for the
 > 
 >  NuPIC platform. It may be some single site or may
 be a
 >  section on
 > 
 >  Numenta.org (or some another place). Making a
 prototype of
 >  NLH is
 > 
 >  considered not a very sophisticated task so I can
 do it
 >  because
 > 
 >  web-development is my common job (of course if
 somebody
 >  wants to help
 > 
 >  me it will be great also).
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  This is the idea in short. Speaking more
 detailed:
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  I suggest there may be 2 main section. First is
 a
 >  “Documentation”,
 > 
 >  which is in essence the standard pages describing
 the
 >  platform, its
 > 
 >  methods, OPF and so on. Users can add comments
 to
 > published
 >  stuff.
 > 
 >  There are lots of examples in the Net (consider
 php.net or
 > something
 > 
 >  of this kind). Of course, the problem is that
 this demands
 >  enormous
 > 
 >  efforts (time in the first turn). So in order to
 make it
 >  much more
 > 
 >  easier there is a second sections which should
 look more
 >  like a
 > 
 >  Stackoverflow (of course it’s hardly to hope
 that it
 > will
 >  have the
 > 
 >  same functionality from the very beginning, but I
 guess it
 >  isn’t
 > 
 >  necessary yet). I.e. any community member may
 leave own
 >  question while
 > 
 >  other members who possesses an answer may create
 it there.
 >  All the
 > 
 >  questions may be ranked by users who votes by a
 standard
 > way
 >  (+/-). So
 > 
 >  after any question got an enough answers or rank
 it may be
 >  used as a
 > 
 >  basics for the “official” stuff in the
 >  “Documentation” sections. It
 > 
 >  means that Admin (Moderator and so on, there may
 be few of
 >  them)
 > 
 >  converts it to the article and places it in the
 section
 >  mentioned
 > 
 >  above. In that section may be “empty”
 articles, i.e.
 >  they have only a
 > 
 >  title, but have no content. However this title is
 a link
 > to
 >  the page
 > 
 >  containing a question dedicated to the subject
 and answers
 >  added by
 > 
 >  community members (i.e. the second section).
 After an
 >  article being
 > 
 >  filled by stuff made of members’ answers there
 a link to
 >  the page
 > 
 >  which contained those answers to see the history
 of
 > question
 >  will be
 > 
 >  added.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  So as a rule we have one of two things: an
 official
 > article
 >  in the Doc
 > 
 >  section or “unofficial” page with the ranked
 question
 >  and answers
 > 
 >  (probably ranked also) to it.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  Of course, there may be lots of other interesting
 things
 > and
 >  we can
 > 
 >  consider all of them after if the community will
 be
 >  interested by the
 > 
 >  idea.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  --
 > 
 >  SY Sergey V. Cleftsow
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  _______________________________________________
 > 
 >  nupic mailing list
 > 
 >  [email protected]
 > 
 >  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  _______________________________________________
 > 
 >  nupic mailing list
 > 
 >  [email protected]
 > 
 >  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
 > 
 >  _______________________________________________
 >  nupic mailing list
 >  [email protected]http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > nupic mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > nupic mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 
 _______________________________________________
 nupic mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
 

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to