I have 650 or so. :/ Sent from my MegaPhone
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: > > If there's no one with such a high score, we can either ask them politely, or > play by the rules which (as far as I understand) requires 50 people to : > > question is voted up: +5 > answer is voted up: +10 > answer is marked “accepted”: +15 (+2 to acceptor) > > http://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation > > Minimally: (5+10+15=30) * 50 = 1500 :-) > > Or finally we can use some other venue for categorised topics. > > Azat > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 11/7/13, Azat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 8:52 PM > > Ah, but SO wants "1500 reputation" > for a new tag like 'nupic' ... > [ Creating the new tag 'nupic' requires at least 1500 > reputation. ] > > Just tried to post a question, anyone has 1500 on SO already > ? > > Azat > > -------------------------------------------- > On Thu, 11/7/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] NuPIC Learning Hub > To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013, 5:24 PM > > I've like the idea of > StackOverflow, in fact I've looked into it in the past. > The thing about getting a dedicated StackExchange section > is > that there needs to be ample evidence of interest first. > The > Area51 crew are not going to approve a NuPIC site without > a > large community of active supporters. I was planning on > moving in this direction once we've grown a bit more. > It's not easy to get an Area51 proposal into a SO site, > for example, Arduino is still in the proposal stage > (http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/58150/arduino). > > > The best place to start is on the main > stackoverflow site itself. > > How about this... > There are no questions tagged with > "nupic" at this point, which is great because we > have an empty namespace to occupy: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/nupic > > > I welcome anyone with a technical question about > NuPIC to post it on http://stackoverflow.com > with the tag "nupic". It would also be a good idea > (at least initially) to post a link to your question on > the > mailing list until we built up enough steam on SO that it > is > consistently monitored by the community. > > > Any volunteers? > ---------Matt TaylorOS Community > Flag-BearerNumenta > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at > 3:13 PM, Mark Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > A wiki is an > awesome idea! Numenta, how about it? I think this is > something that would benefit you too. I too have been > struggling to get started. There is much you have to > discover the hard way. > > > > For a > Stackoverflow style of site, how about..... > Stackoverflow! > At least initially anyway. If that is popular then we > could > propose a nupic version at http://area51.stackexchange.com/ and > get our own StackNupic. I definitely agree that this style > of site is much more useful than trying to search mail > lists. > > > > Let's start > asking and answering questions there and see how it > goes. > > > > CheersMark > > > > On 7 November 2013 > 19:18, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hello everybody! > > > > It seems that as the community grows the problem of being > a > good > > documentation and stuff which can help to learn NuPIC > becomes more > > important. For example I personally resolved my problem of > installing > > NuPIC just accidentally by getting an advice from one of > friends. The > > solution was buried in depth of many posts and I didn’t > aware about > > it. Now I have a very useful experience which could help > other > > members. But where should I publish it to make it easy to > get by them? > > If I write to the mailing list it may be the same case. Of > course > > there are other great places — wiki, Youtube channel, > but > they have > > own limitations. > > > > So here is an idea to build some kind of a learning center > (let’s call > > it “NLH” — NuPIC Learning Hub). Every member of > community may > > contribute to NLH by adding own answers to questions which > were asked > > by other members if he/she has a time and/or such a > willing. > Gradually > > those answers may form stuff for a comprehensive > documentation for the > > NuPIC platform. It may be some single site or may be a > section on > > Numenta.org (or some another place). Making a prototype of > NLH is > > considered not a very sophisticated task so I can do it > because > > web-development is my common job (of course if somebody > wants to help > > me it will be great also). > > > > This is the idea in short. Speaking more detailed: > > > > I suggest there may be 2 main section. First is a > “Documentation”, > > which is in essence the standard pages describing the > platform, its > > methods, OPF and so on. Users can add comments to > published > stuff. > > There are lots of examples in the Net (consider php.net or > something > > of this kind). Of course, the problem is that this demands > enormous > > efforts (time in the first turn). So in order to make it > much more > > easier there is a second sections which should look more > like a > > Stackoverflow (of course it’s hardly to hope that it > will > have the > > same functionality from the very beginning, but I guess it > isn’t > > necessary yet). I.e. any community member may leave own > question while > > other members who possesses an answer may create it there. > All the > > questions may be ranked by users who votes by a standard > way > (+/-). So > > after any question got an enough answers or rank it may be > used as a > > basics for the “official” stuff in the > “Documentation” sections. It > > means that Admin (Moderator and so on, there may be few of > them) > > converts it to the article and places it in the section > mentioned > > above. In that section may be “empty” articles, i.e. > they have only a > > title, but have no content. However this title is a link > to > the page > > containing a question dedicated to the subject and answers > added by > > community members (i.e. the second section). After an > article being > > filled by stuff made of members’ answers there a link to > the page > > which contained those answers to see the history of > question > will be > > added. > > > > So as a rule we have one of two things: an official > article > in the Doc > > section or “unofficial” page with the ranked question > and answers > > (probably ranked also) to it. > > > > Of course, there may be lots of other interesting things > and > we can > > consider all of them after if the community will be > interested by the > > idea. > > > > > > -- > > SY Sergey V. Cleftsow > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nupic mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nupic mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org _______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
