dexter itu sudah pasti psychopath kan? bukan sociopath?

2010/8/22 冴羽獠 (Ryo Saeba) <[email protected]>

> malah makin bingung. di wiki pun nggak ada beda yang jelas. intinya adalah,
> mereka bisa membedakan mana yang benar dan mana yang salah, they just don't
> care.
> Portrait of a 
> sociopath<http://www.sociopathworld.com/p/portrait-of-sociopath.html>
>   From Craig, M., Catani, M., Deeley, Q., Latham, R., Daly, E., Kanaan,
> R., Picchioni, M., McGuire, P., Fahy, T., & Murphy, D. (2009). Altered
> connections on the road to psychopathy Molecular Psychiatry, 14 (10),
> 946-953 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2009.40
>
> The manipulative con-man. The guy who lies to your face, even when he
> doesn’t have to. The child who tortures animals. The cold-blooded killer.
> Psychopaths are characterised by an absence of empathy and poor impulse
> control, with a total lack of conscience. About 1% of the total population
> can be defined as psychopaths, according to a detailed psychological profile
> checklist. They tend to be egocentric, callous, manipulative, deceptive,
> superficial, irresponsible and parasitic, even predatory. The majority of
> psychopaths are not violent and many do very well in jobs where their
> personality traits are advantageous and their social tendencies tolerated.
> However, some have a predisposition to calculated, “instrumental” violence;
> violence that is cold-blooded, planned and goal-directed. Psychopaths are
> vastly over-represented among criminals; it is estimated they make up about
> 20% of the inmates of most prisons. They commit over half of all violent
> crimes and are 3-4 times more likely to re-offend. They are almost entirely
> refractory to rehabilitation. These are not nice people.
>
> So how did they get that way? Is it an innate biological condition, a
> result of social experience, or an interaction between these factors?
> Longitudinal studies have shown that the personality traits associated with
> psychopathy are highly stable over time. Early warning signs including
> “callous-unemotional traits” and antisocial behaviour can be identified in
> childhood and are highly predictive of future psychopathy. Large-scale twin
> studies have shown that these traits are highly heritable – identical twins,
> who share 100% of their genes, are much more similar to each other in this
> trait than fraternal twins, who share only 50% of their genes. In one study,
> over 80% of the variation in the callous-unemotional trait across the
> population was due to genetic differences. In contrast, the effect of a
> shared family environment was almost nil. Psychopathy seems to be a lifelong
> trait, or combination of traits, which are heavily influenced by genes and
> hardly at all by social upbringing.
>
> The two defining characteristics of psychopaths, blunted emotional response
> to negative stimuli, coupled with poor impulse control, can both be measured
> in psychological and neuroimaging experiments. Several studies have found
> decreased responsiveness of the amygdala to fearful or other negative
> stimuli in psychopaths. They do not seem to process heavily loaded emotional
> words, like “rape”, for example, any differently from how they process
> neutral words, like “table”. This lack of response to negative stimuli can
> be measured in other ways, such as the failure to induce a galvanic skin
> response (heightened skin conduction due to sweating) when faced with an
> impending electrical shock. Psychopaths have also been found to
> underactivate limbic (emotional) regions of the brain during aversive
> learning, correlating with an insensitivity to negative reinforcement. The
> psychopath really just doesn’t care. In this, psychopaths differ from many
> people who are prone to sudden, impulsive violence, in that those people
> tend to have a hypersensitive negative emotional response to what would
> otherwise be relatively innocuous stimuli.
>
> What these two groups have in common is poor impulse control. This faculty
> relies on the part of the brain called the prefrontal cortex, most
> particularly the orbitofrontal cortex. It is known that lesions to this part
> of the brain impair planning, prediction of consequences, and inhibition of
> socially unacceptable behaviour – the cognitive mechanisms of “free won’t”,
> rather than free will. This brain region is also normally activated by
> aversive learning, and this activation is also reduced in psychopaths. In
> addition, both the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala show substantial
> average reductions in size in psychopaths, suggesting a structural
> difference in their brains.
>
> These findings have now been united by a recent study that directly
> analysed connectivity between these two regions. Using diffusion tensor
> imaging (see post of August 31st 2009), Craig and colleagues found that a
> measure of the integrity of the axonal tract connecting these two regions,
> called the uncinate fasciculus, was significantly reduced in psychopaths.
> Importantly, connectivity of these regions to other parts of the brain was
> normal. These data thus suggest a specific disruption of the network
> connecting orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala in psychopaths, the degree of
> which correlated strongly with the subjects’ scores on the psychopathy
> checklist.
>
> All of these findings are pointing to a picture of psychopathy as an
> innate, genetically driven difference in connectivity between parts of the
> brain that normally drive empathy, conscience and impulse control. Not a
> fault necessarily, and not something that could be classified as a disease
> or that is always a disadvantage. At a certain frequency in the population,
> the traits of psychopathy may be highly advantageous to the individual.
>
> This conclusion has serious ethical and legal implications. Could a
> psychopath mount a legal defense by saying “my brain made me do it”? Or my
> “genes made me do it”? Is this any different from saying my rotten childhood
> made me do it? Psychopaths know right from wrong – they just don’t care.
> That is what society calls “bad”, not “mad”. But if they are
> constitutionally incapable of caring, can they really be blamed for it? On
> the other hand, if violent psychopaths are a continuing danger to society
> and completely refractory to rehabilitation, what is to be done with them?
> Perhaps, as has been proposed in the UK, people with the extreme
> psychopathic personality profile (or maybe in the near future even a
> specific genetic profile?) should be monitored or segregated even before
> they commit a crime.
>
> While it is crucial that these debates are informed by good science, these
> issues have no clear-cut answers. They will be resolved on a pragmatic
> basis, weighing the behaviour that society is willing to tolerate versus the
> rights of the individual, whatever their brains look like, to define their
> own moral standards.
>
>
> --
>
> http://ryosaeba.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/membedah-artikel-jiplakan-di-koran-anak-indonesia/
>
>


-- 
http://ryosaeba.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/membedah-artikel-jiplakan-di-koran-anak-indonesia/

Reply via email to