Latest webrev looks good...thanks!

-renee

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:54:04AM -0700, Michael Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:58:28 -0700
> Renee Danson Sommerfeld <renee.sommerfeld at sun.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:45:33AM -0700, Michael Hunter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:27:16 -0700
> > > Michael Hunter <michael.hunter at sun.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > New webrev (and I'll probably have another one tomorrow morning with a
> > > > few more things in it esp. a fix for a problem I see with IPv4 static
> > > > addresses).
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > New webrev up.  Has updated comment for XXX, seb-099, and fix for
> > > static addresses didn't work without a refresh.
> > 
> > ncp.c, lines 547-550: Minor wordsmithing on the comment for
> > nwamd_ncp_deactivate_priority_group_all(); I would suggest
> > 
> >   This function deactivates all priority groups at level 'priority'
> >   and lower (which is, numerically, all priorities >= priority).
> 
> ACCEPT
> 
> > 
> > ncu.h: does nwamd_plumb_unplumb_interface() still need to be in here?
> >     It should only be called via the two wrappers you added, right?
> 
> removed, in ncu.c made static
> 
> > 
> > ncu_ip.c, line 591: any special reason this is a syslog() call and
> >     not nlog()?
> 
> That message shouldn't be there nor the line next to it.  Both removed.
> 
> > 
> > ncu_phys.c: woohoo, no more XXX!!  Special thanks to Alan for jumping
> >     in on that one while on vacation.
> 
> Definitely!
> 
> New webrev up.
> 
> I will update bugs after my lunch.
> 
>               mph
> 
> > 
> > -renee

Reply via email to