hi On 06/08/15 12:11, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 6.8.15 11:59 , Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >> I understand the concern here Michael. But then I am not sure on the >> best way forward. It has mostly jsp and couple of classes. The class >> would need to be adapted to work with Oak and we would also need to >> remove dependency on jackrabbit-core as it would not be possible to >> support both (due to conflicting lucene version). if you have any >> suggestion on how to structure it that would be helpful. If its not ok >> to put the sample here I can remove it but I do not see a simple way >> to structure it without copying > >I agree this being difficult. Do we at least have an idea of the >benefit/future cost ratio of this? How do we maintain it (i.e. make sure >both copies get all future fixes)? Is this an official part of Oak or >rather an example? In the latter case, can we make this more explicit?
if it's an example we can put it to oak-example. angela > >Michael
