[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13627602#comment-13627602
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-709:
-----------------------------------
In revision 1466373 I added a specialised rebase handler for purging pending
changes. Currently that handler does nothing in the case of conflicts apart
from {{TODO().unimplemented()}}.
IMO conflict handling should not / cannot throw exceptions here. This would be
most unexpected by clients. What we should do here IMO is to annotate the tree
with access control specific conflict markers, which are evaluated later on in
the respective validator. This would then be the right place to throw an
exception.
> Consider moving permission evaluation to the node state level
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-709
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-709
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
> Attachments:
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> 0001-OAK-709-Consider-moving-permission-evaluation-to-the.patch,
> OAK-709_2.patch, OAK-709_3.patch, OAK-709_4.patch, OAK-709-equals_hack.patch,
> OAK-709.patch, SecureNodeState.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
