On Jul 12, 2008, at 09:22, Alan Burlison wrote: > That's not what I said. I said that the list of things you > identified didn't 'own' other subservient groups. I wasn't talking > about where code eventually ended up. Your proposal doesn't match > the way the existing ON gate works internally - the ON gate doesn't > own the projects that integrate into it. The ON CTeam manages the > integration of projects and defines processes and standards that > projects must adhere to in order to integrate - that's a long way > from 'owning' the projects. Neither do the ARCs own the projects > who present their case materials to the ARC for approval.
Hey, I'm not here to argue with you, as I am clueless on the details - I am just feeding back what I thought I heard. I clearly am not as familiar with the way Sun's Solaris team works as you. I'd rather you told me what would work please, within the parameters I'm proposing (of a manageable top-level for governance purposes). Or are you asserting that is impossible? S.
