On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:07 PM, John Plocher <john.ploc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What rules is he breaking? As others have noted, there has never been a >> "accept all contributions" rule, in this or any other open source project. ... > JBeck is simply abiding by the age-old "rule" that things don't > integrate into the main tree unless and until they have received ARC > approval". Since the ksh-93 gnu modernization project withdrew its > ARC case because of the unresolved issues brought up during ARC > review, it isn't surprising that JBeck's response is what it is...
John, would you mind reading the code reviews Olga has published? The controversial /usr/gnu/bin builtin ARC case was not part of them. The only ARC cases the putback would cover are: PSARC/2009/414 AST versions of fold, mktemp, pathchk, & tty PSARC/2010/078 xgrep Both have been approved by PSARC. Code review was finished, too. I would like to hear which other rules need to be obeyed. My company was interested in becoming a major contributor to Opensolaris but this scandal is going to ruin it. Irek _______________________________________________ ogb-discuss mailing list ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
