On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, John Kim wrote: > In short, the plan of using the D&D Players Handbook (which is > mostly classs, equipment, and spell lists) as the core rulebook for > other genre games is a little bizarre to me. Could you produce a D20-compatible rules book for your modern genre (let's call the game "I Spy"), and also a "core" rules system book based on Open Game content released in the SRD and say "These core rules are compatible with I Spy"? That is, can you have your cake and eat it too, as long as you're careful? Adam ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Alexander P. Macris
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Jason Levine
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Justin Bacon
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 John Kim
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Adam Dray
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Brad Thompson
- [Open_Gaming] "Hi Cost"? John Nephew
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 John J. Kaufman
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 chris
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 John J. Kaufman
