On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Alexander P. Macris wrote: > If you reply that, no, no, D20SRD will just be a bare bones and you'll > have to produce all the 'content' from scratch (classes, races, monsters, > spells, magic items), then I will return to my original position, which > is that D20SRD would be no big benefit to the gaming community at all. Have you even _looked_ at the draft D20SRD? Race, classes, skills and feats are in it _now_, and we have been told that most, if not all, monsters, magic items and spells are going to be in it. Goto http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/d20srd.html Granted this is pre-release draft stuff that is subject to change, but it _is_ what we have been working with. -- http://www.spellbooksoftware.com If guns are outlawed can we use swords? ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- [Open_Gaming] Rant about rant #2 J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant about rant #2 Lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant about rant #2 Alexander P. Macris
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant about rant #2 J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant about rant #2 Lizard
- [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Alexander P. Macris
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard J. Michael Looney
- RE: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard Jason Levine
- Re: [Open_Gaming] reply to Lizard kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Justin Bacon
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 John Kim
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Adam Dray
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Brad Thompson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Rant #2 J. Michael Looney
