In a message dated 9/21/00 9:56:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Yep. I remember. I'm just using it as an example to help >> understand the current license. > >Doesn't help. Was released under a draft version (0.3 IIRC) which has >little to do with the current version. And as far as I understood it, people that released material prior to the final version are *required* to alter their work once the final versions are approved...which means that Clark should go back and mention the parts which are PI and OGC, if that is indeed the way it is interpreted. -Paul @ CFE/NSG ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet kevin kenan
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's A... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's A... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's A... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Chad Thornton
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's A... Jason Levine
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's A... Chad Thornton
