Chad wrote:
"It also makes it look like you are using the
distribution of the license as a marketing ploy in and
of it self, and I really find fault with this.
This says to me "Come to my website and check out my
products, and while you are here you can check out the
license".
I agree with that critique. That is why I proposed
originally that we be allowed to link to some other
site where the licenses are located, whether that be
the OGF or WotC. This definately should not be a
marketing ploy. I dont mind putting the licnese in the
product, I just hate that it takes up a page of the
product, which would have pissed me off as a consumer.
And it looks cheesy.
I dont think it is my stance that "you have to own a
computer and be on the web to participate." And I dont
me to keep your hypothetical rural female from
creating d20 product. I am concerned about the very
real world problem of devoting a page of product (that
the consumer has to pay for both in print cost and in
loss of one page of content) to legal notices.
Tipping the appologetic hat all net-less rural,
anticipatory d20 participants,
Clark
=====
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
