At 07:08 PM 9/22/00 -0700, Clark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Here is the problem with that position. Only a maximum >of 5% of purchasers are ever going to care about >whether content is open or closed because it has no >impact on running the game. The only people who would >care are future d20 developers who want to use >something from my work in their future work. Shouldn't you cater to those people, since the whole premise behind the OGL/D20 concept is that everyone benefits when the community of developers grows? If you use any OGL work created by others in a product, you're getting something of value. WOTC gave you something of value by developing OGL/D20 and marketing the D20 trademark. I think the value of those things surpasses the cost of printing the OGL, which could probably fit on one side of a page. Rogers Cadenhead E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.prefect.com ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet kevin kenan
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet J. Michael Looney
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet FrogGod
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amule... Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Chad Thornton
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Question about The Wizard's Amulet Chris DeLisle
