"Ryan S. Dancey" wrote: > > Basically, no general interest mag is going to be able to exist and cover > d20 > > in what we might think of as a normal manner. That is a loss to the > industry > > not a gain. > > I disagree with your analysis. > > Take Dragon Magazine for example. A 3rd party pubisher who wanted to > produce Dragon Magazine, and replace all the "D&D" content with Open Game > Content derived from the System Reference Document could do so easily. [snip] > Not only do I think it is possible, I believe (based on my inbox) that it is > a virtual certainty that there will be more than one d20 focused magazines > avaialble in the new year. Neither of these are general interest mags, Ryan. Justin Bacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? LJP1963
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Githianki
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Githianki
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Justin Bacon
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Justin Bacon
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Justin Bacon
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Justin Bacon
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Clark Peterson
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Keith Johnson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Doug Meerschaert
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? William Olander
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Clark Peterson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Mixed Works? Justin Bacon
