From: "lizard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Even at its simplest, advancement in D&D3 is still more
> > complicated than it is in RQ. Ability bonus every 4 levels, Feat
> > every 3 levels, look up on the chart for your special abilities,
> > spend N+Int bonus skill points -- but not above the maximum of
> > 3+Level or (3+Level)/2 depending on whether it is a class skill or
> > not. Then add in synergy bonuses if you pass a threshold. etc.
> >
> As opposed to "What the hell do I need to roll under in order to mark
> this skill as one which might advance?" in Runequest?
You can't get simpler than that. If you succeed, put a check mark next
to the skill. Period.
A skill either has a check next to it or it doesn't. At the end, roll
all the skills that have check-marks, and if the roll fails, the skill
advances a few percentage points.
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Justin Bacon
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Aaron Smalley
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Mark \"Tipop\" Williams
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Mark \"Tipop\" Williams
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Paul Jackson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? R. Hyrum Savage
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? lizard
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Mark \"Tipop\" Williams
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Jason Lotito
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Mark \"Tipop\" Williams
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Mark \"Tipop\" Williams
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? brian . e . hollenbeck
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Walter Christensen
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? John Kim
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Source of games? Justin Bacon
