> Kal Lin > > Consider if people closed off public domain names. There is > no original copyright holder. Are you suggesting just never > citing their work even if they build on yours, mine and everyone > else's open content? Public domain names are no different than any other kind of OGC or PI. If the public domain name was OGC before it was PI, then the party who made it PI is in breach. If it wasn't, then it is now theirs if you choose to derive from their work. Since it is a public domain name, you can still use it in works that do not derive from it. Yes, that might be pretty disappointing if they did something really cool with it, but that's one consequence of how the OGL handles PI. -Brad _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Greg Gliedman
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Clark Peterson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Rogers Cadenhead
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Kal Lin
- RE: [Ogf-l] d20 and Naked Licenses Brad Thompson
