> Kal Lin
>
> Then ALL open content in the bogus claimed work is closed to
> the arctic adventure writer because they can't cite the bogus
> claimed work. The bogus producer can use as much open content
> as they like and still produce an essentially 100% closed work.
> They just need to mark as PI the bits that will most likely be
> needed to reuse any of it.
It isn't closed, it's in violation. You can't use it because then you too
would be in violation as soon as the original copyright holder got around to
notifying the bogus work's creator of the breach. It isn't legal to take
their work and 'do it right for them' because that isn't one of the rights
they granted to you under the OGL.
> How would
> you feel about asking for permission to use a derivative of something
> you opened up at one point?
I wouldn't. I'd notify them of a breach and expect them to cure it within
30 days per the terms of the license. Otherwise they are breaking the law,
and I have recourse.
-Brad
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
