At 09:41 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, korath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >What I'd have to ask, is why does the company not want the writer >specifically, to profit off it, yet anyone else could take the NPC (and >as long as it's properly attributed), and profit off it. That's the same question I would ask. It seems amusingly graceless to force the creator of a work to be the only person on the planet who can't use his own NPC in an OGL-licensed product. Rogers Cadenhead E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.cadenhead.org _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- RE: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL korath
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Chad Thornton
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Curtis Bennett
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL woodelf (lists)
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
