[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Yeah but that's the problem. The OGL will give affiliates of BWR more rights >than they are supposed to have. For example, I am a both a writer and a board >member for BWR. If we design an RPG then I may not take that work and go >start a for profit company with it. However, if it later becomes open >content, then I could. That would be really bad. I would very much love to >be wrong about the OGL providing this kind of loophole in the structure of >the NPO, but I think it does, so I have to correct it somehow. > What would happen if you made it public domain? They're probably a lot more case-law regarding that than there is "copyleft," and from where I sit the effect on MA's 501(c) laws would be simliar. DM _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- RE: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL korath
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Chad Thornton
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Curtis Bennett
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL woodelf (lists)
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Gary
