In a message dated 09/10/2001 11:21:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > How bizarre. It seems to me that if the NPC is OGC, then why would any other > > company pay for something that's already freely available? That doesn't > make > any sense? Sorry, once again my inability to clearly communicate has caused confusion. I used that scenario to illustrate my question. It is not an actual case. Maggie _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
- [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- RE: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Brad Thompson
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL korath
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Chad Thornton
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Curtis Bennett
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL woodelf (lists)
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Alec A. Burkhardt
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: [Ogf-l] contracts and the OGL MaggieVining
