I tend to agree with Alec. The d20 mag as written really cant be an open content publication (even though it contains the OGL). I really think WotC needs to be more clear about this, ie: "This product contains the OGL for illustrative purposes. This product is not a work covered by that license. Any Open Content referenced here is listed as a aid to the reader and any reference to that content must refer to the original source which contains it." Because if they meant for us to cite to the open content in the magazine, they did a shitty job. Which leads me back to agreeing with Alex--this cant be an open content publication.
Clark ===== http://www.necromancergames.com "3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
