>> ...which of course runs afoul of the licenses becasue >> if the d20 mag isnt an open work then they violate the >> license by taking open content and NOT providing it as >> open content.
>> The magazine violates the license any way you look at >> it. IANAL, and don't pretend to be... But WoTC owns the SRD, and doesn't have to use the licenses to publish it. WoTC can contact the authors of derivative works and offer to publish them in d20 Dragon. Then WoTC grants them a mini-license to use the SRD content, outside of the OGL, sole for use in publishing in the d20 Dragon. Thus the material used in the Article, is now derivative of the SRD, but not via the OGL -- so it doesn't need to be "re-released under the OGL." Or do I have everything backwards again? -- Mike _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
