On Sun, 7 Oct 2001, Richard Stewart wrote: > Not trying to turn this into a personal letter but since it seems my point > is NOT being made to the forum in general I will one last time defend it. > > Alec > > John is right...I made my stance quite clear. If no major and popular > mechanic besides the SRD or derivatives of it are being used, then > regardless of what is permitted by the OGL, the only OGC is SRD based...
But that isn't what you said, and therefore not what I responded to. You said there was a problem with the OGL because the only OGC released was the SRD and what was derived from it. This my be a problem with the Open Gaming Movement, but it in no way illustrates a problem with the OGL. And the argument that publishers aren't using the OGL because the only thing released under it is the SRD is circular. alec _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
