>Well, while I agree with you to a certain extent... > >I play the part of the bastard :) > >25% isn't "Open". You can't have your cake and eat it too. I know it >sounds like semantics, but setting limitations like that destroys the whole >concept of "open". It is YOUR job to control what you want to allow others >to use from your document.
and we're back to the two versions of "open": "you must be able to do whatever you want with the work (including close it)" "you must not be able to produce closed material with the work" the WotC OGL basically follows the first idea. i basically follow the second. -- woodelf <*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/woodelph/ If any religion is right, maybe they all have to be right. Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers, just as long as you say them. --Sinclair _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
