Hello Russ

>From The Desk of Wolfy at Money Talks Enterprises,

On 15-Jan-02, you wrote:

> Yes. I don't think there's any case for saying WotC should grant SRD use 
> of terms like illithid, or the complicated societies they've built up 
> around races like the drow, illithids, beholders, and sahaugin. But a 
> "commonality of appearance" sounds more good than bad.

I have been following every word of this discussion as most of you have, and
I think this is one of the smartest things that has been said in regards to
the whole thing.  It brings me back to my ankheg question of 3 or 4 months
ago (that almsot started and would have started this same type of
discussion - if any cared a hoot for ankhegs the way they do Mind Flayers).
 Just what could I confer from the stat-block.  The answers were just
exactly like this mind flayer discussion (vague and heated), so I finally
decided to use creatures from SRD sparingly or not at all.  If my two
creature developers ever come to life, then my book will only contain a few
of the stat blocks from SRD that have been converted to Mutazoid's stats to
show how easily it can be done, but it is completely pointless to try to
include any creature as a main important race that I can never illustrate
or describe properly.

Like everyone I love Mind Flayers, and I wanted to do a d20 module based
around a group of Mind Flayers reaching Mutazoids Earth accidently. I might
still be able to eke one out, but it may not be very good.  I might as well
just develop an entirely new alien creature from scratch using an empty
stat-block, and then keep all my description and culture completely
proprietary too. People can use my stat block and make the GM buy my book
to get the rest of the information and illustrations, but they will prolly
just do me like they are doing WOTC, you know, whatever works.  LOL.

Mutazoids, The Rebellion is on!
-- 
Wolfy
http://www.mutazoids.com/ 

ICQ- 13469530
AIM- Wolfy2264


_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to