That is what I thought, however, Mynex from the PCGen development team is saying this: "So here's the deal and this comes from _WotC_ lawyers, so make no mistake this is the situation.
Since PCGen's inception, since the very 1st data files were included, we were OGL compliant. How so? The second ANYONE uses and OGC content, they have accepted the conditions of the OGL." This can be somewhat backed up by section 3 of the OGL. I do not currently receive Dragon and Dungeon at the moment. But since they are no longer a publication of WOTC, have they "... accepted the conditions of the OGL"? I don't think that section 3 can be taken out of context like that, can it? Thanks, *:> Scott From: "Scott Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1) If you use any material from the SRD and you do not specify that > your product is d20 or OGL and you have not included the OGL license, > is your product an OGL product? No, it's a copyright violation. > 2) The second ANYONE uses and OGC content, they have accepted the > conditions of the OGL. Is that true, even if they don't say the > product is OGL and they do not include the OGL license? No, that's also a copyright violation. Get paid to surf the web! http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=ANY-592 ____________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE Web and POP E-mail Service in 14 languages at http://www.zzn.com. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
