> > There it is! I was trying to remember that phrase. Thanks for the > > clarification, Luke. Yeah. Human readable. > > There is no such requirement. Only that any OGC must be clearly identified. > One way to clearly identify OGC is in a human readable form. There are > others. Encrypted OGC that is clearly identified as such is still OGC. It's > completely against the spirit of the license, but it still complies with the > terms. > > -Brad
For software programs under the OGL, the OGC portions (data) must be human readable. That is the Wizards' interpretation. That is good enough for me. I don't feel any need to disagree. Anyone that wants to go differently, realize the risk you take. Andrew McDougall a.k.a. Tir Gwaith _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
