> Wizards opened up D&D with the OGL.  For any product
> that fits this 
> niche (class and level fantasy RPG), there's no
> longer _any_ excuse not 
> to be OGL'd.

That is an extreme position. Dont expect everyone to
adopt that position. I certainly dont. Particularly
something like any Chaosium product that is based on a
pre-existing game. I hate to break it to everyone but
d20 is a fad. It will pass. And when it does,
Runequest and CoC (non-d20) and all the other games
will remain. I know we like to consider ourselves
revolutionary, but that is very short sighted IMHO.

> If a product is supposed to be open
> but isn't, then why 
> should I help support them cheating the system? 

Aha! The heart of the problem at last!

You presume that anyone not opening everything up is
cheating the system. That, my friend, is a faulty
presumption. Have we seen it sometimes? Perhaps. I'm
sure some would say that current whipping boy Mongoose
has done that on occasion. Some may have said I have
done it. I dont know. But to presume every time there
is not a designation that you would like that the
person is "cheating the system" is not a valid
presumption. Take a look at the Chaosium book. I cant
call say it shows a pattern of cheating the system.
When I look at it I see ignorance of the license
coupled with the paranoia of loosing the IP rights to
the original system. Not cheating.

Clark

=====
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to