> But the point of what he is saying is that by NOT
> going back, with a better knowledge of the license,
> and correcting the previous mistakes, that is the
> "cheating". 

But that is such an idealistic position. It takes time
and effort to do what you mention. And that product
didnt do well, to my knowledge. I have actually been
to the Chaosium office in Oakland (years ago I
personally returned a Arthurian product because it was
defective, I happened to be in Oakland visiting a
girlfriend). This is not a big operation, folks. They
dont have the time to go back and revisit these
"mistakes" on a product that isnt selling. That is a
waste of time. In a ideal world, would the do so? I
would think yes. 

Clark

=====
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to