I dunno. I've heard from many publishers that the only real enforcer forThe only one who really enforces the OGL is Wizards--but that's more because it's their license and their material.
the OGL is Wizards, being their license.
If WotC didn't take action and someone was copying Everquest wrongly, you can bet that SSS, White Wolf, and/or Sony could and would take legal action.
I haven't brought to my lawyer,The lawyers on this list are apparantly asleep--but I'm rather confident that anyone with standing can bring a suit for violation of the OGL. Wizards just happens to have the most instances where they're the licensor, and thus have very solid standing.
but if I release something under the OGL and it is my copyright, I assume I
have every right to take a person violating the license to court. A couple
of publishers don't think that is the case, and that Wizards is the only one
that can, being that the license is theirs. So if GRG wanted to enforce
termination of the licence, etc for their game system usage, they would have
to have their own.
If GRG released Action! under the OGL, they'd be in almost exactly the same legal boat as Wizards is with the SRD. (Maybe more, as GRG didn't draft the license...)
DM
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
