On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Thomas Roell wrote: > In your message of 10 April 2000 you write: > > > > The cleanest solution IMO is that gl.h should not > > > define any extensions when glext.h is in use. > > > > ...Or the prototype function pointer could be left outside of the guardian > > ifdef in glext.h since gl.h won't define function *pointers* only the > > functions themselves. > > This would cause a problem with gl.h implementations that include > function pointers for extensions supported directly in libGL ... Does anyone actually do that (other than under Windoze that is) ? Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hti.com Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stuart Anderson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Mark Kilgard
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote resul... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
