In your message of 10 April 2000 you write:
> > The cleanest solution IMO is that gl.h should not
> > define any extensions when glext.h is in use.
>
> ...Or the prototype function pointer could be left outside of the guardian
> ifdef in glext.h since gl.h won't define function *pointers* only the
> functions themselves.
This would cause a problem with gl.h implementations that include
function pointers for extensions supported directly in libGL ...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Roell /\ An imperfect plan executed violently
Xi Graphics / \/\ _ is far superior to a perfect plan.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / / \ \
/ Oelch! \ \ George Patton
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stuart Anderson
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Mark Kilgard
- Re: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Ron Bielaski
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: ... Stephen J Baker
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote resul... Thomas Roell
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
- RE: [oglbase-discuss] Vote results: 1 YES, 2 A Michael Gold
