So we have a go decision. Isos are uploaded on sf.net so someone needs to unhide them and put some announcement on our blog.
Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska 30 sty 2015 21:52 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > I think we're a go for this LxQt alpha. > Just gotta polish up release notes/announcement and push it. > > On 30 January 2015 at 10:41, Chris Tanner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with this. > > > > Chris > > > > On 30/01/15 10:12, Ben Bullard wrote: > >> > >> Yes, Go, let's release what we have and continue work. > >> Ben Bullard > >> ben79 > >> -------------------- > >> OpenMandriva-QA Team > >> > >> On 01/30/2015 07:10 AM, Colin Close wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> It's a difficult one after all it does boot and you can install it. > >>> Failed bootloader installations are due to missing boot bios > partitions in > >>> MBR mode and it is possible fix either by creating the partition at > install > >>> time or installing grub manually using blocklists this requires the > --force > >>> option on the grub command line. I have already written a piece > detailing > >>> the issues on the WIKI. The rest is pretty much usable the main issue > being > >>> a broken rpmdrake and samba. Samba is easily fixed (missing samba > directory > >>> in /run) and if we do a final spin that is easily fixed. > >>> urpmi works fine and I have already put stuff in the release notes > about > >>> the broken rpmdrake. Though the broken mdkapplet is a pain. I'm in > favour of > >>> release but I do think we need get some fixes out for the more major > issues > >>> asap. We should also point out that KDE4 is available in the repos and > is > >>> working should people wish to install it. > >>> The 2015 release represents a huge amount of work ~(moving to clang and > >>> major updates swcripting laguages) it's time we put out something to > show > >>> that we are making progress. I'm giving it a Go. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Colin Close > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Robert Xu <[email protected]> > >>> To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]> > >>> Sent: Fri, Jan 30, 2015 6:58 am > >>> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] Calling it Pre-Alpha (Was: Re: [om-qa] Testing > >>> alpha ISO 9036) > >>> > >>> > >>> Personally, I think it's good enough for a go this round, as long as we > >>> emphasize that a KDE5 Alpha will come soon. > >>> Not everything has to work. We still have to flesh out the barriers > >>> between alpha/beta/rc, and we're just getting to the point where we can > >>> safely determine what constitutes what based on manpower. > >>> But your thoughts? Note that once things start working, they shouldn't > >>> regress. UEFI wasn't working before, so it's reasonable to have it > still > >>> malfunctioning this round. > >>> On 29 Jan 2015 20:22, "Ben Bullard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Was there a Go/Nogo determination? If so I missed it. > >>> > >>> Ben Bullard > >>> ben79 > >>> -------------------- > >>> OpenMandriva-QA Team > >>> > >>> > >>> On 01/29/2015 06:07 PM, Tomasz Gajc wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> As you may not have follow TC meetings we decided to go with > LXQt > >>> with alpha, because kde4 is well known and it would give bad > >>> impressions that we are lazy, second KF5 is not yet ready even > as > >>> alpha, other desktops based on wayland are way to experimental. > >>> > >>> LXQt alpha was about to show off great work done on clang > switch, > >>> but now this is lost. > >>> > >>> I asked it few times to create some basic QA procedure for > testing > >>> ISO, upgrade from previous releases done weekly, and it never fleshed > out. > >>> Mostly this looks like some kind of rush because I have to ping > on ML > >>> about to test iso and get some feedback. Robert I suggest to > you to > >>> start working on QA procedure of testing, because current > situation > >>> is highly unprofessional. > >>> > >>> My frustration has nothing to do here, because I used to this > over > >>> last 3 three releases. What really concerns me is that we on > Fosdem > >>> will have noting to offer to visitors. > >>> > >>> What I should say to visitors who will notice our banner that we > >>> are 100% clang, and they asked for iso? > >>> There are no usb sticks to give away, so idea was to give QR > >>> code to sf.net alpha release. > >>> > >>> Speaking of manpower, I bet you have friends who are interested in > Linux, > >>> ask them maybe this will help to get new people on board. > >>> > >>> Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OM-Cooker mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-Cooker mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > -- > cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
