So did we release something?

Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
31 sty 2015 12:43 "Jean-Claude Vanier" <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> The 2015 alpha has been unhidden:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openmandriva/files/alpha/2015.0/
>
>
> 2015-01-31 12:27 GMT+01:00 Kate Lebedeff <[email protected]>:
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > Please give us links and we do it
> >
> >
> >
> > On 31.01.2015, at 09:29, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > So we have a go decision.
> >
> > Isos are uploaded on sf.net so someone needs to unhide them and put some
> > announcement on our blog.
> >
> > Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
> >
> > 30 sty 2015 21:52 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> I think we're a go for this LxQt alpha.
> >> Just gotta polish up release notes/announcement and push it.
> >>
> >> On 30 January 2015 at 10:41, Chris Tanner
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I agree with this.
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >> >
> >> > On 30/01/15 10:12, Ben Bullard wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, Go, let's release what we have and continue work.
> >> >> Ben Bullard
> >> >> ben79
> >> >> --------------------
> >> >> OpenMandriva-QA Team
> >> >>
> >> >> On 01/30/2015 07:10 AM, Colin Close wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>> It's a difficult one after all it does boot and you can install it.
> >> >>> Failed bootloader installations are due to missing boot bios
> >> >>> partitions in
> >> >>> MBR mode and it is possible fix either by creating the partition at
> >> >>> install
> >> >>> time or installing grub manually using blocklists this requires the
> >> >>> --force
> >> >>> option on the grub command line. I have already written a piece
> >> >>> detailing
> >> >>> the issues on the WIKI. The rest is pretty much usable the main
> issue
> >> >>> being
> >> >>> a broken rpmdrake and samba. Samba is easily fixed (missing samba
> >> >>> directory
> >> >>> in /run) and if we do a final spin that is easily fixed.
> >> >>> urpmi works fine and I have already put stuff in the release notes
> >> >>> about
> >> >>> the broken rpmdrake. Though the broken mdkapplet is a pain. I'm in
> >> >>> favour of
> >> >>> release but I do think we need get some fixes out for the more major
> >> >>> issues
> >> >>> asap. We should also point out that KDE4 is available in the repos
> and
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> working should people wish to install it.
> >> >>> The 2015 release represents a huge amount of work ~(moving to clang
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> major updates swcripting laguages) it's time we put out something to
> >> >>> show
> >> >>> that we are making progress. I'm giving it a Go.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Colin Close
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>> From: Robert Xu <[email protected]>
> >> >>> To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]>
> >> >>> Sent: Fri, Jan 30, 2015 6:58 am
> >> >>> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] Calling it Pre-Alpha (Was: Re: [om-qa]
> >> >>> Testing
> >> >>> alpha ISO 9036)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Personally, I think it's good enough for a go this round, as long as
> >> >>> we
> >> >>> emphasize that a KDE5 Alpha will come soon.
> >> >>> Not everything has to work. We still have to flesh out the barriers
> >> >>> between alpha/beta/rc, and we're just getting to the point where we
> >> >>> can
> >> >>> safely determine what constitutes what based on manpower.
> >> >>> But your thoughts? Note that once things start working, they
> shouldn't
> >> >>> regress. UEFI wasn't working before, so it's reasonable to have it
> >> >>> still
> >> >>> malfunctioning this round.
> >> >>> On 29 Jan 2015 20:22, "Ben Bullard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Was there a Go/Nogo determination? If      so I missed it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ben Bullard
> >> >>> ben79
> >> >>> --------------------
> >> >>> OpenMandriva-QA Team
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>      On 01/29/2015 06:07 PM, Tomasz Gajc wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> As you may not have follow TC meetings we decided to        go with
> >> >>> LXQt
> >> >>> with alpha, because kde4 is well known and it would        give bad
> >> >>> impressions that we are lazy, second KF5 is not yet        ready
> even
> >> >>> as
> >> >>> alpha, other desktops based on wayland are way to
> experimental.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> LXQt alpha was about to show off great work done on        clang
> >> >>> switch,
> >> >>> but now this is lost.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I asked it few times to create some basic QA        procedure for
> >> >>> testing
> >> >>> ISO, upgrade from previous releases done weekly, and it never
> fleshed
> >> >>> out.
> >> >>> Mostly this looks like some        kind of rush because I have to
> ping
> >> >>> on ML
> >> >>> about to test iso and        get some feedback. Robert I suggest to
> >> >>> you to
> >> >>> start working on        QA procedure of testing, because current
> >> >>> situation
> >> >>> is highly        unprofessional.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> My frustration has nothing to do here, because I used        to this
> >> >>> over
> >> >>> last 3 three releases. What really concerns me is        that we on
> >> >>> Fosdem
> >> >>> will have noting to offer to visitors.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> What I should say to visitors who will notice our        banner that
> >> >>> we
> >> >>> are 100% clang, and they asked for iso?
> >> >>>         There are no usb sticks to give away, so idea was to give QR
> >> >>> code to sf.net        alpha release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Speaking of manpower, I bet you have friends who are interested in
> >> >>> Linux,
> >> >>> ask them maybe this will help to get new        people on board.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> >>> [email protected]
> >> >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > OM-Cooker mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OM-Cooker mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OM-Infra mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-infra-openmandriva.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org

Reply via email to