So did we release something?
Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
31 sty 2015 12:43 "Jean-Claude Vanier" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> napisał(a):
The 2015 alpha has been unhidden:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openmandriva/files/alpha/2015.0/
2015-01-31 12:27 GMT+01:00 Kate Lebedeff <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Hi guys!
>
> Please give us links and we do it
>
>
>
> On 31.01.2015, at 09:29, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> So we have a go decision.
>
> Isos are uploaded on sf.net <http://sf.net> so someone needs to
unhide them and put some
> announcement on our blog.
>
> Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
>
> 30 sty 2015 21:52 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> napisał(a):
>>
>> I think we're a go for this LxQt alpha.
>> Just gotta polish up release notes/announcement and push it.
>>
>> On 30 January 2015 at 10:41, Chris Tanner
>> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > I agree with this.
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > On 30/01/15 10:12, Ben Bullard wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, Go, let's release what we have and continue work.
>> >> Ben Bullard
>> >> ben79
>> >> --------------------
>> >> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>> >>
>> >> On 01/30/2015 07:10 AM, Colin Close wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>> It's a difficult one after all it does boot and you can
install it.
>> >>> Failed bootloader installations are due to missing boot bios
>> >>> partitions in
>> >>> MBR mode and it is possible fix either by creating the
partition at
>> >>> install
>> >>> time or installing grub manually using blocklists this
requires the
>> >>> --force
>> >>> option on the grub command line. I have already written a
piece
>> >>> detailing
>> >>> the issues on the WIKI. The rest is pretty much usable the
main issue
>> >>> being
>> >>> a broken rpmdrake and samba. Samba is easily fixed
(missing samba
>> >>> directory
>> >>> in /run) and if we do a final spin that is easily fixed.
>> >>> urpmi works fine and I have already put stuff in the
release notes
>> >>> about
>> >>> the broken rpmdrake. Though the broken mdkapplet is a
pain. I'm in
>> >>> favour of
>> >>> release but I do think we need get some fixes out for the
more major
>> >>> issues
>> >>> asap. We should also point out that KDE4 is available in
the repos and
>> >>> is
>> >>> working should people wish to install it.
>> >>> The 2015 release represents a huge amount of work ~(moving
to clang
>> >>> and
>> >>> major updates swcripting laguages) it's time we put out
something to
>> >>> show
>> >>> that we are making progress. I'm giving it a Go.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Colin Close
>> >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Robert Xu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >>> To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
>> >>> Sent: Fri, Jan 30, 2015 6:58 am
>> >>> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] Calling it Pre-Alpha (Was: Re:
[om-qa]
>> >>> Testing
>> >>> alpha ISO 9036)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Personally, I think it's good enough for a go this round,
as long as
>> >>> we
>> >>> emphasize that a KDE5 Alpha will come soon.
>> >>> Not everything has to work. We still have to flesh out the
barriers
>> >>> between alpha/beta/rc, and we're just getting to the point
where we
>> >>> can
>> >>> safely determine what constitutes what based on manpower.
>> >>> But your thoughts? Note that once things start working,
they shouldn't
>> >>> regress. UEFI wasn't working before, so it's reasonable to
have it
>> >>> still
>> >>> malfunctioning this round.
>> >>> On 29 Jan 2015 20:22, "Ben Bullard" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Was there a Go/Nogo determination? If   so I missed it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ben Bullard
>> >>> ben79
>> >>> --------------------
>> >>> OpenMandriva-QA Team
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Â Â Â On 01/29/2015 06:07 PM, Tomasz Gajc wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> As you may not have follow TC meetings we decided to Â
  go with
>> >>> LXQt
>> >>> with alpha, because kde4 is well known and it would Â
  give bad
>> >>> impressions that we are lazy, second KF5 is not yet Â
  ready even
>> >>> as
>> >>> alpha, other desktops based on wayland are way to  Â
 experimental.
>> >>>
>> >>> LXQt alpha was about to show off great work done on Â
  clang
>> >>> switch,
>> >>> but now this is lost.
>> >>>
>> >>> I asked it few times to create some basic QAÂ Â Â Â
procedure for
>> >>> testing
>> >>> ISO, upgrade from previous releases done weekly, and it
never fleshed
>> >>> out.
>> >>> Mostly this looks like some    kind of rush because
I have to ping
>> >>> on ML
>> >>> about to test iso and    get some feedback. Robert
I suggest to
>> >>> you to
>> >>> start working on    QA procedure of testing,
because current
>> >>> situation
>> >>> is highly    unprofessional.
>> >>>
>> >>> My frustration has nothing to do here, because I used Â
  to this
>> >>> over
>> >>> last 3 three releases. What really concerns me is  Â
 that we on
>> >>> Fosdem
>> >>> will have noting to offer to visitors.
>> >>>
>> >>> What I should say to visitors who will notice our  Â
 banner that
>> >>> we
>> >>> are 100% clang, and they asked for iso?
>> >>>Â Â Â Â Â There are no usb sticks to give away, so idea
was to give QR
>> >>> code to sf.net <http://sf.net>Â Â Â Â alpha release.
>> >>>
>> >>> Speaking of manpower, I bet you have friends who are
interested in
>> >>> Linux,
>> >>> ask them maybe this will help to get new    people
on board.
>> >>>
>> >>> Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OM-Cooker mailing list
>> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
>> >
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 <http://github.com/robxu9>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Cooker mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OM-Infra mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-infra-openmandriva.org
>
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Infra mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-infra-openmandriva.org
