On 8 Sep 2011, at 00:04, Dave Fisher wrote: > > +1, they are when a few individuals dominate the conversation making it > difficult for consensus to build or solutions to be defined. Instead we went > round and round.
Agreed. It would be wonderful if responses could amplify the part of proposals that is good rather than focussing on what is wrong and going on to attempt to discredit the source. Answers on policy and non-code questions are going to take the accumulation of wisdom from multiple sources. S.
