Hi,
Le 8 sept. 11 à 01:04, Dave Fisher a écrit :
Honestly this seems like mailing lists are an awful way to take
decision.
Someones votes will be swamped by the hundred of other emails
comenting and
flamewaring making the vote completely disappeared. We need better
software
to account this voiting, like a poll or something similar.
We need to consider two things, what people decide and their
reasoning. So
mailing list is good to express opinion or responses. But is bad
to account
how many people actually say I am forward this or I still havent
make a
decision.
+1, they are when a few individuals dominate the conversation
making it difficult for consensus to build or solutions to be
defined. Instead we went round and round.
I am getting the feeling that if someone ever puts together a
concrete proposal that we are going to need to have a [VOTE], but
probably not one where a single -1 is a veto.
Not sure this will work here, but I remember, when a decision was
difficult to take, we invited people to vote on IssueZillla :
Issue number XXXX means +1
Issued number YYYY means -1
Add a deadline, and go. Oh, I forgot : only the one we cannot we
cannot associate the identity and the pseudo can vote several times,
as usual.
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
