On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:39 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> >
> > --- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As Rob Weir has put it ...
> > ...
> > > >
> > > > So obviously there is limited volunteer bandwidth to
> > > > migrate the wiki.
> > > > And I've heard from several people, on and off
> > > > the list, that much of what is on the wiki is
> > > > not very useful.
> > > >
> > >
> > > uh, well...I don't know bout this. I was under the
> > > impression that MUCH of developer info was here.
> > >  Others would need to weigh in but I think it was
> > > widely used because of the ease of use.
> > >
> > Just my word of advice:
> >
> > Check the MediaWiki at http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/
> >
> > If we take out information about Hg (dead),
> > the Development Teams and Projects (which will have to
> > be reorganized), Old News, the issue tracker ...
> >
> > Is the information left worth it to run through a
> > MW-->CWiki conversion effort?
> >
> > I think given the license situation we should just
> > leave that stuff as read-only for now and do all new
> > work on CWiki
>
> IMo someone needs to find out who user Hohenheim on the current wiki is
> and get them to stop adding pages, cause it looks like the last couple
> of hundred new pages all come form that account and all in the last
> couple of weeks.
>
> it may be that if you got that person to move the pages over to cwiki,
> that the read-only version of MW is up to date with the older version
> already.
>
>
> @Alexandro - do you know who this is?
>
> //drew
>
>
Yes he is one of our interns, and not only him. I asked about this situation
a few weeks ago but there was no reply on this topic.


-- 
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* EspaƱol
http://es.openoffice.org
fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6

Reply via email to