> >> only when they tried red text on green background
> >> the scientists were not able to read the information. of course, that
> >> combination couldn't be accepted, as 4% of the population has some  
> >> sort
> >> of green/red color blindness...
> >
> > The display doesn't need to be color unless you are putting up color
> > photos of the candidates.
> 
> Sure, but red/green color deficiency can manifest as an inability to  
> distinguish between red and green, so there might not be enough  
> contrast for some folks to read the screen at all.

I wasn't suggesting that voting machines use red text on green background.
I was suggesting that if radiation is a concern, to use tempest shielded 
displays.
All the ballots I've ever seen were in black and white.  I don't see a need
for a color display in a voting machine unless you want to display color
photos of the candidates.  I'm not familiar with what models of tempest
shielded displays are currently available, but a black and white model
might be less expensive than a color model, or have some other advantage.
Of course they probably don't make a black and white tempest shielded
display with HDCP.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to