On 2/22/07, Attila Kinali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Moin,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:25:21 -0500
"Timothy Normand Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Howard has made another step forward.  Everything's tested except for
> analog video and TV.

May i open a bottle ? :-)

I'm waiting until analog video is tested.  :)


> Howard believes he's identified all of the bugs
> in OGD1 except for anything possibly in the those two portions.  Our
> PCB guy is working on the changes.

While he is at it, could he do me a favor and route the wires
to the header pins as impedance controled lines with the pins
that are near each other being a differential pair... if they
aren't already and if there is enough space. I have some ideas
that i'd like to test with OGD1 and therefore i need a more or
less reliable way to transmit a few 100MHz signals.

I would suggest soldering to the pads for the 500MHz DACs.  You should
be able to find headers that have the same pin-spacing as the chips we
could otherwise hypothetically place there.  I don't recall how many
are shared with the TV chip, but I think it's not all of them.
They're also connected to I/O drivers that are designed to do
differential signaling, IIRC.


>  As soon as analog video is tested,
> we're going to start taking orders.  We'll hand over the designs to
> the fab house immediately, but we don't want to start production until
> the first 100 boards have been ordered.  In that lag period, we'll
> probably check out the TV section.

I'll order two! :-)

Excellent!  :)

Speaking of that, should we put a general limit on the number of
developer-price boards we would want to sell to any one developer?

Actually, we should, but how many?

--
Timothy Normand Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
Favorite book:  The Design of Everyday Things, Donald A. Norman, ISBN
0-465-06710-7
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to