Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release

[Craig L Russell]

Hi Kevin,




Craig

On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:

I agree that the problem with sub-selects on DB2 seems significant enough to stop the release.

Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 until we get the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for OPENJPA-182, that looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts have been touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 tests clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to other

suggestions.

Kevin

On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Craig and others,
Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222...  A couple of weeks ago, DaveW

basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for
OPENJPA-182.  The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues.


but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort.


expected function.

Thanks,
Kevin

On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for
> fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting
> the incubator)?
>
> Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant
> release?
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
>

> > the tests
> > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has.
> >
> > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is?
> >
> > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> >>> get that issue resolved if possible.
> >>

>
> >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later?
> >>
> >> -Patrick
> >>
> >> --
> >> Patrick Linskey
> >> BEA Systems, Inc.

>
> >> __
> >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> contain
> >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> affiliated
> >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> and/or
> >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> individual
> >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient,

> >> this
> >> by email and then delete it.
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM
> >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release
> >> >
> >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Michael-
> >> > >
> >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote:
> >> > >

>
> >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed.
> >> > >

> >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release.
> >> >
> >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the
> >> majority. For
> >> > > now, my vote changes to +0.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take
> >> > another look
> >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow.
> >> >
> >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with
> >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to
> >> > get that issue resolved if possible.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > -Michael Dick
> >> >
> >>
> >> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may
> >> contain
> >> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and
> >> affiliated
> >> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted
> >> and/or
> >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> >> individual or
> >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> >> recipient, and
> >> have received this message in error, please immediately return
> >> this by email
> >> and then delete it.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Michael Dick
>
> Craig Russell

committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the changes and through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, re-worked and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't sufficiently test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding that This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to warrant a re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple of days, As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant release... We (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the EJB3 Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no longer present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not regress > > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't run > >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good reason why > >> _____________________________________________________________________ > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do need to > >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live with the > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release with the > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ products/jdo

> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature