Sorry, I meant to send this out sooner but I'm rescinding this vote. The docbook jar needs to be removed and we need to resolve the problem with DB2.
On 4/19/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kevin, I agree that the problem with sub-selects on DB2 seems significant enough to stop the release. Craig On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Another alternative is to back out the changes for OPENJPA-182 > until we get > the complete solution.. But, looking at the changes for > OPENJPA-182, that > looks to be quite the job and I'm not sure how many of these parts > have been > touched since that commit... I would rather wait until OPENJPA-222 > tests > clean and then go forward with another vote... But, I am open to > other > suggestions. > > Kevin > > On 4/19/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Craig and others, >> Here's the scoop with OPENJPA-222... A couple of weeks ago, DaveW >> committed some changes to OPENJPA-182. Patrick reviewed the >> changes and >> through discussions on the dev mailing list and the Issue itself, >> re-worked >> and re-committed the changes. We dropped the ball and didn't >> sufficiently >> test these new changes against DB2 until recently. We are finding >> that >> basically any sub-selects will not work with DB2 with the changes for >> OPENJPA-182. The changes for OPENJPA-222 will resolve these issues. >> >> This problem (no sub-selects with DB2) seems severe enough to >> warrant a >> re-spin of the release. I know this pushes us out another couple >> of days, >> but I think from a "customer perspective", it's worth the effort. >> >> As far as this 0.9.7 being bundled with some significant >> release... We >> (IBM) were planning to use the 0.9.7 release with a refresh of the >> EJB3 >> Feature Pack. Our plans have since changed, so the urgency is no >> longer >> present. I just want any OpenJPA release to be usable and not >> regress >> expected function. >> >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> >> On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > This isn't the last release of openjpa. What is the urgency for >> > fixing this before our major event (the last release before exiting >> > the incubator)? >> > >> > Is this release planned to be bundled with some other significant >> > release? >> > >> > Craig >> > >> > On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Dick wrote: >> > >> > > I probably should have worded that differently since I haven't >> run >> > > the tests >> > > against DB2. I believe Dave's team has. >> > > >> > > Dave, can you comment on how big the impact of OpenJPA-222 is? >> > > >> > > On 4/18/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with >> > >>> Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to >> > >>> get that issue resolved if possible. >> > >> >> > >> I'm a little nervous about scope creep. Is there some good >> reason why >> > >> > >> OPENJPA-222 needs to be resolved now vs. later? >> > >> >> > >> -Patrick >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Patrick Linskey >> > >> BEA Systems, Inc. >> > >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> > >> > >> __ >> > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> > >> contain >> > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> > >> affiliated >> > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> > >> and/or >> > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> > >> individual >> > >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> > >> recipient, >> > >> and have received this message in error, please immediately >> return >> > >> this >> > >> by email and then delete it. >> > >> >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > >> > From: Michael Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] >> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:24 PM >> > >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.7-incubating release >> > >> > >> > >> > On 4/18/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Michael- >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Michael Dick wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > I'd rather not cut another release, but I think we do >> need to >> > >> > > > resolve the issue with the docbook jar. If we can live >> with the >> > >> > >> > > > extra jar then the vote can proceed. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Personally, I think it is sufficiently ugly to release >> with the >> > >> > > docbook jar to justify starting another release. >> > >> > >> > >> > However, if others disagree, I'll happily accede to the >> > >> majority. For >> > >> > > now, my vote changes to +0. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I agree but like you I can be talked out of it. I'll take >> > >> > another look >> > >> > over everything and start another release tonight / tomorrow. >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm a little nervous about OpenJPA-222. From talking with >> > >> > Dave it sounds like it has a large effect on DB2. I'd like to >> > >> > get that issue resolved if possible. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -Michael Dick >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> > >> contain >> > >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> > >> affiliated >> > >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> > >> and/or >> > >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> > >> individual or >> > >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> > >> recipient, and >> > >> have received this message in error, please immediately return >> > >> this by email >> > >> and then delete it. >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > -Michael Dick >> > >> > Craig Russell >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ >> products/jdo >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > >> > >> > >> Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
-- -Michael Dick
