At 9:17 PM -0400 on 7/16/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Really, I would just love for xTalk to get some recognition in the >Codewarrior world. Very few C programmers consider xTalk a serious language >if they know of it at all, which is sad. They might be swayed if they saw it >elegantly accomplishing the same stuff they do with nasty looking C. I'd advise you that any code converted to one language to another (e.g., HyperTalk -> C++) will _not_ be pretty or elegant. I'd suggest a real compiler -- something I might do someday. Anyone interested in egcs 1.1.1 Macintosh? I'm quite tempted with some of the features it has, and I'd like to give it a time test vs. MrCpp. I think once I get Bug Tracker done (it almost is), I'll try it :).
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Michael Fair
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Goofball OT question Yennie
